A vol d’ oiseau: desenvolvimentos recentes no direito de greve na União Europeia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
EnglishThe right to strike in the European Union, despite its recognition in the Charter of Fundamental Rights and the judgments in Laval and Viking-Line cases, amongst others, it has always been equated to the freedom of establishment and the freedom to provide services showing the unresolved tension between social and economic, as underlined in the proposal for a Council Regulation on the exercise of the right to take collective action and its subsequent withdrawal. A comparison of the limitation of the right to strike between the Court of Justice and national courts judgements shows the prevalence of the social aspect in the latter. portuguesO direito de greve na Uniao Europeia, nao obstante o seu reconhecimento na Carta dos Direitos Fundamentais e nos Acordaos “Laval” e “Viking-Line”, entre outros, tem sido sempre equacionado com relacao as liberdades de estabelecimento e de prestacao de servicos, revelando a tensao nunca resolvida entre social e economico, como evidenciou a Proposta de Regulamento do Conselho relativo ao exercicio do direito de accao colectiva e o seu abandono subsequente. A comparacao da limitacao ao direito de greve entre a jurisprudencia do Tribunal de Justica e dos tribunais nacionais revela a acentuacao da vertente social.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".