MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2587568247 · doi:10.1007/s00125-016-4146-6

Glucose concentrations of less than 3.0 mmol/l (54 mg/dl) should be reported in clinical trials: a joint position statement of the American Diabetes Association and the Europian Association for the Study of Diabetes

2016· article· en· W2587568247 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDiabetologia · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Management and Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniformed Services University of the Health SciencesSheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustPeking University People's HospitalPeking UniversityNovo NordiskUniversity of TorontoRadboud UniversiteitMonash UniversityUniversity of LeicesterUniversity of SheffieldWashington University in St. LouisServierUniversity of MinnesotaSanofiBristol-Myers SquibbEli Lilly and CompanyAstraZenecaKing's College LondonUniversity of DundeeGlaxoSmithKlineAmgen
KeywordsHuman physiologyPosition statementAssociation (psychology)Diabetes mellitusMedicineInternal medicineStatement (logic)EndocrinologyClinical trialPsychologyFamily medicinePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Position Statement The International Hypoglycaemia Study Group recommends that the frequency of detection of a glucose concentration <3.0 mmol/l (<54 mg/dl), which it considers to be clinically significant biochemical hypoglycaemia, be included in reports of clinical trials of glucose-lowering drugs evaluated for the treatment of diabetes mellitus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.143
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.163
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Reporting · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.857
Threshold uncertainty score0.757

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1430.163
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.006
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0040.009
Scholarly communication0.0100.004
Open science0.0080.003
Research integrity0.0500.028
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.172
GPT teacher head0.423
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainReporting
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations359
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiabetologiaSame topicDiabetes Management and ResearchFrench-language works237,207