MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2587568374 · doi:10.1109/jmems.2016.2618774

A Silicon-Based Porous Thin Membrane as a Cancer Cell Transmigration Assay

2017· article· en· W2587568374 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Yahya Hosseini, Sepeedah Soltanian‐Zadeh, Vaishnavi Srinivasaraghavan, Masoud Agah

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Microelectromechanical Systems · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDivision of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport SystemsUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsWaferMaterials scienceMembraneEtching (microfabrication)SiliconReactive-ion etchingPorous siliconOptoelectronicsLayer (electronics)MicrofluidicsNanotechnologyBiomedical engineeringChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a novel microfabricated Boyden chamber in silicon with well-defined pore sizes and controlled membrane thickness for cell migration analysis. The chip-based chamber is fabricated employing lithography and deep reactive ion etching techniques on a double-sided polished silicon wafer. The device contains micro-pores with a silicon oxide layer at the top and a deep microfluidic channel at the bottom, which is anodically-bonded to a glass wafer for sealing and facilitating the imaging and chemoattractant feeding. The applicability of the chip has been demonstrated through the distinct migratory behaviors of highly metastatic breast cancer cells, MDA-MB-231, through pores with 8 μm in diameter, 50 μm in spacing, and 30 μm in thickness. Employing the above technique, the membrane thickness variation among different chips was below 10%. Utilizing this micro-Boyden chamber device, we have shown that MDA-MB-231 cells migrated distinctively in higher rate than the cells which had gone through sphingosine kinase inhibitor drug treatment or no chemoattractant feeding over a course of 12 hours. Furthermore, we validated the performance of the micro-Boyden chamber by quantifying the migration rate of the cancer cells under different chemoattractant gradient profiles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.103
Threshold uncertainty score0.816

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Microelectromechanical SystemsSame topicMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207