Mechanisms and Application for Hydraulic Pulsed Cavitating Jet Generator
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To improve the rate of penetration (ROP) further, based on analysis of the jet modulating mechanism, a new drilling tool is designed which couples the advantages of both pulsed jet and cavitating jet. When drilling fluid flows through the tool in drilling process, the fluid is modulated to pulsed and cavitating jet by impellers and in self-resonant chamber. Thus, pulsed cavitating jet is formed at the outlet of the bit nozzle. Because of jet pulsation, cavitating erosion and local negative pressure effect, bottom cuttings cleaning efficiency is enhanced and the ROP is improved. The hydraulic pulsed cavitating jet generator has been applied in 8 oil fields and more than 100 wells in China. The results indicated that the maximum density of test drilling fluid was 1.70 g/cm 3 , the maximum test well depth was 6,162 m. The generator could work over 230 h, and the maximum operation time was above 520 h. As the result, the average ROP had been increased by 10.1% to 104.4%. The generator has the characteristics of simple structure and long operation time, and has a well adaptability to the existing drilling equipments, technological parameters, which provides a safe and efficient new drilling technology for deep well.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".