MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2587622077 · doi:10.1093/pch/14.suppl_a.14ab

Factors Influencing Research Utilization in the Development of Evidence-Informed Child Welfare Policy

2009· article· en· W2587622077 on OpenAlexaff
Peter Dudding, Susan M. Jack, Lil Tonmyr, Maureen Dobbins, Betty M. Kennedy, S Brooks

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicNursing Education, Practice, and Leadership
Canadian institutionsChild Welfare League of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWelfarePolicy developmentPublic economicsMedicinePsychologyEnvironmental healthPolitical scienceEconomicsPublic administrationLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

P Dudding, S Jack, L Tonmyr, M Dobbins, B Kennedy, S Brooks; Factors Influencing Research Utilization in the Development of Evidence-Informed Child Welfare Poli

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.410
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.636
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.590
Threshold uncertainty score0.728

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.4100.636
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0080.008
Science and technology studies0.0060.008
Scholarly communication0.0160.007
Open science0.0030.012
Research integrity0.0050.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.235
GPT teacher head0.463
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
DomainMethods
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child HealthSame topicNursing Education, Practice, and LeadershipFrench-language works237,207