MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2587740197 · doi:10.3130/aijs.68.103_1

EFFECT OF BOND PERFORMANCE ON SHEAR TRANSFER MECHANISM IN REINFORCED CONCRETE MEMBERS

2003· article· en· W2587740197 on OpenAlex
Seijiro IIDA, Masayuki Hamahara, Hiromitsu Suetsugu, Tsuyoshi Fukui

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Structural and Construction Engineering (Transactions of AIJ) · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Canadian institutionsPQ Corporation (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArchReinforcementDiagonalStructural engineeringBondReinforced concreteShear (geology)Materials scienceTension (geology)Monotonic functionComposite materialEngineeringMathematicsUltimate tensile strengthGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Monotonic loading test were conducted on four reinforced concrete short beams in order to investigate the shear transfer mechanism due to arch action. The test variables included the amount of web reinforcement and bond performance of longitudinal reinforcement (i. e. bond or no bond). The conclusions obtained from this investigation were as follows. 1) All the test beams failed due to abrupt propagation of diagonal tension crack. 2) Linear strain distribution was observed in the concrete of unbonded test beams. This result implies that the arch action does not exist in unbonded beams, which is contradicted to the theorem on arch action.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.562
Threshold uncertainty score0.933

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it