MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2587747127 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/now212.594

NTOX-08. SAFETY OF INTRA-ARTERIAL CHEMOTHERAPY IN THE TREATMENT OF BRAIN TUMOURS

2016· article· en· W2587747127 on OpenAlexaff
David Fortin, Samuel Caux, G. Gahide

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineChemotherapyEtoposideCarboplatinDissection (medical)Stroke (engine)Internal medicineSurgeryRadiologyOncology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The treatment of brain tumors is greatly limited the delivery impediment caused by the blood-brain barrier and blood-tumor barrier. To circumvent this limitation, different approaches have been studied, including intra-arterial delivery. Because of a significant local increase in plasma-peak concentration, this strategy increases the local area under the curve, and translates into a 3 to 5.5 fold increase in intra-tumoral chemotherapy concentration. However, intra-arterial chemotherapy in the treatment of brain tumors has a notoriously bad name, thanks to prior trials led in past decades showing significant neurotoxicities. This toxicity was related to the choice of therapeutics. Different agents are now available devoid of such toxicity, and we believe it is now time to revisit this approach. In this paper, we present our experience regarding the safety of this intra-arterial chemotherapy. For 15 uninterrupted years now, we have been using intra-arterial chemotherapy in the treatment glioma, lymphomas and metastatic disease, using a varied array of agents: carboplatin, etoposide phosphate, melphalan, methotrexate and doxil. As each patient enrolled in our trials undergo an MR scan prior to each cycle on monthly basis, and all these reports are archived in a centralized medical informatics system (Ariane) we used a database search of keywords associated to vascular complications: stroke, lacuna, lacunar stroke, bleeding, hematoma, dissection, ischemia, ischemic, etc. Once a keyword was identified in a report, the chart was reviewed and the MR scan was pulled and also reviewed by a radiologist (GG). On a total of 3583 intra-arterial treatments in 722 patients, we found a total of 55 vascular complications, 28 of which were symptomatic (20 lacuna, 5 strokes). Asymptomatic findings were mostly small lacuna (n=21) and 4 small hematomas. In this paper, we provide a full breakdown of the data. We conclude that intraarterial chemotherapy is reasonably safe.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-Oncology→Same topicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→