MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Mixed Donor Chimerism and Low level alpha-L-iduronidase Expression May Be Adequate for Neurodevelopmental Protection in Hurler’s Syndrome.

2004· article· en· W2587935932 on OpenAlexaff
Jennifer Conway, Sarah Dyack, Bruce Crooks, Matthias H. Schmidt, Conrad V. Fernandez

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Health and Biochemistry
Canadian institutionsIzaak Walton Killam Health CentreDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHurler syndromeMedicineBusulfanPediatricsEnzyme replacement therapyCyclophosphamideFludarabineLysosomal storage diseaseInternal medicineGastroenterologyTransplantationMucopolysaccharidosis ISurgeryImmunologyChemotherapyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background. Hurler’s syndrome is a lysosomal storage disease with devastating neurological sequelae if left untreated. The negative correlation between age and IQ is significant (r = −0.82, p< 0.0003). These children have a normal intelligence at birth but on average decline by 2 standard deviations within the first 2 years of life (represents 30 point decrease in IQ). The underlying abnormality is an absence of the enzyme alpha-L-iduronidase, which is available as a recombinant enzyme but does not cross the blood-brain barrier. Currently, bone marrow transplant (BMT) is the only way to prevent the expected neurological deterioration. It is believed that higher levels of enzyme activity are associated with better neurological outcomes. Case report: We report on a 4 year 6 month old boy who was diagnosed with Hurler’s syndrome at 9 months of age. At 15 months of age, he received a matched related transplant with a preparative regimen of cyclophosphamide, busulfan and low dose total body irradiation (300 cGy). In the post transplant period, he had some minor complications but no neurological insults. He received Cyclosporin A for GVHD prophylaxis, which was discontinued after 5 months. Initially there was complete engraftment and normal enzyme activity but this was temporary (See Table 1). Table 1 Alpha-L-iduronidase Chimerism % * believed to be secondary to assay problems Pretransplant 0 Post transplant Normal 14–41 nmol/h/mg protein Ideal > 90% 1 month 28 90 4 months 0 45 6 months 14 30 1 year 3 15 1 year 5 months 2 15 1 year 8 months 3 10 2 year 1 month 73* 15 2 year 6 months 4 10 3 year 2 months 3 10 He had an excellent clinical response to BMT with softening of the characteristic facial features and resolution of airway obstruction. Prior to BMT he was report to be developing normally. He sat at 61/2 months, stood at 7 month, had single words at 10 months, and walked at 13 months. Despite mixed chimerism and sub-optimal enzyme activity, his development since BMT has been impressive. 2 years post-BMT (age 3 yr 3 mo), he underwent a formal neuropsychological evaluation. Full Scale intelligence testing revealed he had average intelligence (45th percentile), with a discrepancy between his verbal and performance intelligence. His language skills were within normal limits. He was reported to have some difficulties with visual spatial testing (in block design). Clinical assessment, at this time, revealed that he was doing well in school and had been fully toilet trained. At his last assessment at age 4 yr 5 mo (3 yr 2 mo post BMT), he had made dramatic improvements on the Peabody Developmental Motor Skills, with an age equivalent of 41 months. This was likely hampered somewhat by flexion contractures of his fingers. He continued to do well in school and was speaking both English and French. He had clinically normal development for age. Formal neuropsychological tests will be presented in poster format. Conclusions : This case is the first in the literature with halting of the characteristic neurological decline in Hurler’s syndrome despite poor engraftment and low enzyme activity following BMT. Full donor chimerism and normal alpha-L-iduronidase expression may not be needed to ameliorate the devastating consequences of Hurler’s syndrome.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.127
Threshold uncertainty score0.537

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicNeonatal Health and BiochemistryFrench-language works237,207