Late Relapses Following All-Trans Retinoic Acid for Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia Are Uncommon, Respond Well to Salvage Therapy and Occur Independently of Prognostic Factors At Diagnosis: Long-Term Follow-up of North American Intergroup Study I0129
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Abstract 83 The European APL91 and the North American Intergroup study I0129 reported in the 1990s that ATRA combined with chemotherapy markedly improves the outcome of APL. Large randomized and single arm studies from around the world with both short and relatively long-term follow-up, confirm this impact of ATRA, while optimizing their mode of administration. However, the incidence and outcome of late relapses have not been well established. Furthermore, as strategies to minimize or eliminate chemotherapy by combining ATRA and arsenic trioxide are being adopted, the long-term durability of ATRA and chemotherapy regimens is even more relevant. We now report on late relapses among the APL patients enrolled in the North American Intergroup study I0129 conducted between 4/92 -2/95. Methods: 380 patients (excluding 14 who had never received ATRA, and 3 ineligible) from 6 cooperative oncology groups, were randomized to induction with either ATRA or chemotherapy with daunorubicin and ara-C (DA). Patients then received two cycles of anthracycline-containing consolidation chemotherapy and then irrespective of their induction arm, patients were randomized to receive 1 year of maintenance with ATRA or observation (Obs) (Tallman et al NEJM 1997). Late relapse was defined as relapse 3 years or later from CR. Data analysis as of March 25, 2011 with a median follow-up of 11.8 (ranges 0.4–14.5) years. Results: Of 191 pts on DA and 189 pts on ATRA induction arms, 85 vs. 116 (total 201) were last known to be alive, median OS 3.6 years (95% CI: 2.0, 8.7) vs. not yet reached (p=0.0007), respectively. CR was achieved in 272 (72%) pts, and 113 are known to have relapsed. In addition, 70 relapsed pts. had received ATRA at any time, of them 60 pts relapsed early and 10 pts. relapsed late; 43 pts relapsed patients did not receive any ATRA and all relapsed early (P=0.01). Follow up information is known so far on 5 late relapses. Relapse sites: BM -4 Pts, CNS – 1pt. Late relapse salvage: chemotherapy-5 pts., alloBMT-2 pts., Auto BMT -1pt., arsenic trioxide –none. Of the 10 late relapses, 3 died, all from disease progression. Median duration in CR1 prior to late relapse: survivors vs. died 3.9 and 4.1yrs, respectively. Only 35 (34%) of the early relapses are alive. Two second malignancies in the breast were identified, all in no known relapse pts. Conclusions: This is among the largest studies with very long follow-up to report that, in newly diagnosed APL patients receiving consolidation chemotherapy, the significantly higher OS rate after induction with ATRA compared to chemotherapy, is sustained. Most relapses in APL occur early, including in patients who had received ATRA at any time. Late relapses after 3 years: 1) are uncommon (4%) and are very rare after 4 years (1); at that time CR1 patients are most likely cured; 2) survive longer than early relapses, independent of CR1 duration, implicating the effectiveness of salvage therapy; 3) do not differ from early relapses in WBC and age at diagnosis; 4) were slightly more likely to be on ATRA maintenance. As the number of long-term APL survivors increases, future studies should address survivorship, late treatment-related complications, and determine whether some late relapses represent new therapy-related AML. Finally, if the high rate of early death (Park et al Blood, 2011) can be reduced, more patients will benefit from the high cure rate reported by this and other studies. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".