MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2588032373

The invisibility of international health psychology research

2007· article· en· W2588032373 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Keith J. Petrie

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Health Psychologist · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicChild and Adolescent Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnnalsInvisibilityBehavioral medicineHealth psychologyEditorial boardBehavioural sciencesAlternative medicinePsychologyMedicineGerontologyLibrary sciencePublic healthPsychiatryPsychotherapistHistoryClassicsNursingPathology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The status afforded non-American researchers can be seen in the make up of the editorial boards on the major publications of Health Psychology, Annals of Behavioral Medicine and the Journal of Behavioural Medicine. Health Psychology’s current list of associate and consulting editors comprises no psychologists at all from outside the US. Annals of Behavioral Medicine also has no non-Americans on its editorial board. The Journal of Behaviour Medicine fares little better. Of the 45 associate editors and members of the editorial board, just three are non-American, and two of these are from Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.064
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.798
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0640.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.390
GPT teacher head0.648
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Health PsychologistSame topicChild and Adolescent HealthFrench-language works237,207