TO031IMPACT OF RENAL DENERVATION (RDN) IN PATIENTS WITH LOIN PAIN HEMATURIA SYNDROME (LPHS): THE PRAIRIE LPHS STUDY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction and Aims: Loin pain hematuria syndrome (LPHS) is a painful and incapacitating condition that typically afflicts young women. Treatment options are either opiates and/or surgical denervation of the renal nerves that includes auto transplantation or even nephrectomy with varying success. Methods: Three patients between the ages of 28-62 years (all female) with LPHS underwent endovascular ablation of the renal nerves between July and November 2015 using the Vessix ™renal denervation system. The number and frequency of pain medications, EQ-5D, McGill Pain Questionnaire, Geriatric Depression Score, Short Form (SF)- 36, and Oswestry Disability Index were measured at baseline and at 3 months post-procedure to evaluate changes in pain, disability, quality of life and mood. Results: There were significant improvements in pain (McGill Pain Questionnaire), disability (Oswestry disability index), and quality of life (EQ-5D and SF-36) from baseline to 3-months post-procedure. 2/3 patients were off tylenol #3 and non steroidal anti-inflammatory use, whilst the third had a 70% reduction in the dose of morphine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".