TO031IMPACT OF RENAL DENERVATION (RDN) IN PATIENTS WITH LOIN PAIN HEMATURIA SYNDROME (LPHS): THE PRAIRIE LPHS STUDY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction and Aims: Loin pain hematuria syndrome (LPHS) is a painful and incapacitating condition that typically afflicts young women. Treatment options are either opiates and/or surgical denervation of the renal nerves that includes auto transplantation or even nephrectomy with varying success. Methods: Three patients between the ages of 28-62 years (all female) with LPHS underwent endovascular ablation of the renal nerves between July and November 2015 using the Vessix ™renal denervation system. The number and frequency of pain medications, EQ-5D, McGill Pain Questionnaire, Geriatric Depression Score, Short Form (SF)- 36, and Oswestry Disability Index were measured at baseline and at 3 months post-procedure to evaluate changes in pain, disability, quality of life and mood. Results: There were significant improvements in pain (McGill Pain Questionnaire), disability (Oswestry disability index), and quality of life (EQ-5D and SF-36) from baseline to 3-months post-procedure. 2/3 patients were off tylenol #3 and non steroidal anti-inflammatory use, whilst the third had a 70% reduction in the dose of morphine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".