MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2588102818 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofw172.136

Relationship Between Adenosine Triphosphate and Colony Counts for Monitoring of Surface Cleanliness of Intensive Care Rooms

2016· article· en· W2588102818 on OpenAlexaffabout
Curtis J. Donskey, Michelle J. Alfa, Ícaro Boszczowski, Joost Hopman

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfection Control and Ventilation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaSt. Boniface Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIntensive careAdenosine triphosphateIntensive care medicineEmergency medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background. Ensuring quality of and compliance with surface cleaning protocols in the intensive care unit (ICU) is important for controlling the transmission of pathogens. However, there is no standard method for measuring surface contamination. A prospective study was conducted in 4 countries to measure cleanliness of high-touch surfaces in ICU patient rooms using adenosine triphosphate (ATP), colony counts, reflective surface markers (RSM) and visual inspection, both before (Phase 1) and after educational intervention (IE) of cleaning protocols (Phase 2). Results focusing on the performance of ATP and colony counts as quality indicators are reported. Methods. Standard cleaning procedures for ICU patient rooms were recorded for each of 4 sites in Brazil, Canada, Netherlands, and the United States. Monitoring of surface cleanliness was performed on 50 ICU rooms at each site using 3M CleanTrace ATP Surface Test (reported as relative light units [RLUs]) and microbial culture (reported as colony-forming units per square centimeter [CFUs/cm2]), and a reflective surface marker. The cleanliness pass threshold for ATP sampling was ≤250 RLUs and for bioburden was 2.5 CFU/cm2. Results. The percentage of tested surfaces passing ATP and bioburden thresholds prior to discharge cleaning in Phase 1, by country, ranged from 45.2% and 64.8%, respectively, to 74.8% and 88.4%, respectively. Post-cleaning pass rates were generally higher based on bioburden measurement (range: 90.8%–98.4%) than for ATP measurement (range: 24.7%–91.6%). After retraining interventions in Phase 2, the pass rates for ATP and bioburden measurements generally increased. Using the cutoffs of <250 RLU and >2.5 CFU/cm2, the discordancy rate between the measurements was 61.5%. Lowering the pass thresholds for both measures improved concordance. Conclusion. Re-training and real-time feedback of ATP results had a positive effect on improving ICU room cleanliness based on measures of ATP and bioburden. The clean cutoff threshold for bioburden (2.5 CFU/cm2) is likely too high as few tested surfaces were above the threshold prior to cleaning. Lowering the cutoffs for CFU and/or RLU are shown to improve concordance between ATP and bioburden pass/fail rates. Disclosures. M. Alfa, 3M: Consultant, Consulting fee; I. Boszczowski, 3M: Consultant, Consulting fee; J. Hopman, 3M: Consultant, Consulting fee

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicInfection Control and VentilationFrench-language works237,207