MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2588115577 · doi:10.3892/ol.2017.5739

Association between polymorphisms in TP53 and MDM2 genes and susceptibility to prostate cancer

2017· article· en· W2588115577 on OpenAlexafffund
Mohammad Hashemi, Shadi Amininia, Mahboubeh Ebrahimi, Nasser Simforoosh, Abbas Basiri, Seyed Amir Mohsen Ziaee, Behzad Narouie, Mehdi Sotoudeh, Mohammad Javad Mollakouchekian, Esmaeil Rezghi Maleki, Hamideh Hanafi-Bojd, Maryam Rezaei, Gholamreza Bahari, Mohsen Taheri, Saeid Ghavami

Bibliographic record

VenueOncology Letters · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer-related Molecular Pathways
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersZahedan University of Medical SciencesManitoba Medical Service Foundation
KeywordsOdds ratioProstate cancerMdm2BiologyOncogeneCancerInternal medicineOncologyPopulationConfidence intervalPromoterGeneticsCancer researchGeneMedicineCell cycleGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tumor protein 53 (TP53), a tumor suppressor gene, is a vital cellular cancer suppressor in multicellular organisms. Murine double minute-2 (MDM2) is an oncoprotein that inhibits TP53 activity. A number of studies have examined the association of TP53 and MDM2 polymorphisms with the risk of common forms of cancer, but the findings remain inconclusive. The present study aimed to evaluate the impact of the 40‑bp insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism (rs3730485) in the MDM2 promoter region and the 16‑bp I/D polymorphism (rs17878362) in TP53 on the susceptibility of prostate cancer (PCa) in a sample of the Iranian population. This case‑control study included 103 patients with pathologically confirmed PCa and 142 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. The MDM2 40‑bp I/D and TP53 16‑bp I/D polymorphism was determined using polymerase chain reaction analysis. The results demonstrated that the MDM2 40‑bp I/D polymorphism increased the risk of PCa in a co‑dominant inheritance model [odds ratio (OR)=1.88; 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.11‑3.19; P=0.023, D/D vs. I/I], while this variant marginally increased the risk of PCa in a dominant model (OR=1.69; 95% CI=1.00‑2.83; P=0.051, I/D+D/D vs. I/I). No significant association was observed between the TP53 16-bp I/D polymorphism and PCa. In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that the 40‑bp I/D polymorphism in the MDM2 promoter increased the risk of PCa in an Iranian population. Further investigations with diverse ethnicities and larger sample sizes are required to verify these results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOncology LettersSame topicCancer-related Molecular PathwaysFrench-language works237,207