Resurgence and critical youth empowerment in Whitefish River First Nation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sport/play-based programs are part of new proposed solutions to provide educational and structured opportunities to empower youth and foster social change and community mobilization. While answering a recent call for more research examining these socio-political processes within sport-for-development programs, the purpose of this paper is to explore how the Indigenous youth experiences of the Youth Leadership Program (YLP) from the organization Right To Play could support what Indigenous scholars have called resurgence. This self-conscious traditionalism movement calls for Indigenous critical self-reflection, political thought, and cultural revival that are at the heart of re-empowerment and self-determination. Youth experiences enacted through the YLP are documented through the Critical Youth Empowerment (CYE) model that highlights processes of critical reflection leading to socio-political change. While providing a general appreciation of the YLP program and the application of the CYE model within an Indigenous context, the findings suggest that, to serve resurgence, culture and local knowledge need to be central in empowerment processes and youth programming.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".