MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2588155475

Estudio de grados de alergia a ácaros del polvo (Dermatophagoides Farinae y Dermatophagoides Pteronyssinus) mediante el método "Prick test" en caninos aparentemente sanos de las razas Boyero de Berna, Akita Americano, Labrador Retriever, Golden Retriever y Schnauzer en el centro canino "De Patas" en el sector de Tumbaco

2016· dissertation· es· W2588155475 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gálvez Grijalva, Andrea Estefanía

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languagees
FieldMedicine
TopicAllergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLabrador RetrieverAllergyBreedVeterinary medicineSkin testMedicineBiologyImmunologyAnimal sciencePathology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Skin Prick Test (SPT) is an essential in vivo test based on reproducing in a local manner, the process of type 1 hypersensitivity across the inoculation of selected allergens in the dermis of the patient, with the end goal of establishing the sensitivity in allergic diseases mediated by specific IgEs. As a reference, positive (histamine) and negative (saline) controls were utilized, making measurements every 5, 10 and 15 minutes in order to appreciate the evolution of the skin reaction; using 2 methods of measurement (quantitative and semi-quantitative). The objective of the conducted experiment was to determine the degree of allergy of the two principal types of dust mites, in 26 canines who were apparently healthy, of the breeds Bernese Mountain, American Akita, Schnauzer, Labrador and Golden Retriever in the canine center ¨De Patas¨, located in Tumbaco. Measurements of the histamine wheals were made, and through the use of the Fisher Test, both methods were compared, determining that the correlation between them both were not constant and varied according to time and breed. Therefore, it was established that in order for a more objective interpretation to be made, one of the two methods must be previously selected and applied throughout the entirety of the test. Out of the total sample, 5 patients (19,23%) resulted in being positive, with (++) and (+++) degrees of allergies, highlighting that 2 of them were Golden and Labrador Retriever, which were breeds with a genetic predisposition for allergic diseases, the remaining breed was Schnauzer. In accordance with the independent variables established: age, gender, nutrition and weight, it wasn´t possible to determine their influence at the time of manifestation or absence of sensitivity, as a result of having a reduced and varied samples in each group. However, the habitat in which the animals lived met the conditions of humidity in order for the dust mites to reproduce with ease. Concluding that this test is useful when there is a genetic predisposition to an allergy without clinical signs, since all the patients in this study were apparently healthy. It is essential that this test is not taken as a definitive diagnostic method, but as a support that complements the patient’s history and clinical signs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAllergic Rhinitis and SensitizationFrench-language works237,207