MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2588184272 · doi:10.1111/epi.13697

Validating the shortened Quality of Life in Childhood Epilepsy Questionnaire (QOLCE‐55) in a sample of children with drug‐resistant epilepsy

2017· article· en· W2588184272 on OpenAlexafffund
Lauryn Conway, Elysa Widjaja, Mary Lou Smith, Kathy N. Speechley, Mark A. Ferro

Bibliographic record

VenueEpilepsia · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEpilepsy research and treatment
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of Toronto
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsEpilepsyConfirmatory factor analysisQuality of life (healthcare)Confidence intervalMedicineConvergent validityPsychologyProspective cohort studyStructural equation modelingPsychometricsInternal consistencyClinical psychologyInternal medicinePsychiatryStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Objective The aim of this study was to validate the newly developed shortened Quality of Life in Childhood Epilepsy Questionnaire (QOLCE‐55) in a sample of children with drug‐resistant epilepsy. Methods Data came from 136 children enrolled in the Impact of Pediatric Epilepsy Surgery on Health‐Related Quality of Life Study (PEPSQOL), a multicenter prospective cohort study. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to assess the higher‐order factor structure of the QOLCE‐55. Convergent and divergent validity was assessed by correlating subscales of the KIDSCREEN‐27 with the QOLCE‐55. Measurement equivalence of the QOLCE‐55 was evaluated using multiple‐group confirmatory factor analysis of children with drug‐resistant epilepsy from PEPSQOL versus children with new‐onset epilepsy from HERQULES (Health‐Related Quality of Life in Children with Epilepsy Study). Results The higher‐order factor structure of the QOLCE‐55 demonstrated adequate fit: Comparative Fit Index (CFI) = 0.948; Tucker‐Lewis Index (TLI) = 0.946; Root Mean Square of Approximation (RMSEA) = 0.060 (90% confidence interval [CI] 0.054–0.065); Weighted Root Mean Square Residuals (WRMR) = 1.247. Higher‐order factor loadings were strong, ranging from λ = 0.74 to 0.81. Internal consistency reliability was excellent (α = 0.97, subscales α > 0.82). QOLCE‐55 subscales demonstrated moderate to strong correlations with similar subscales of the KIDSCREEN‐27 (ρ = 0.43–0.75) and weak to moderate correlations with dissimilar subscales (ρ = 0.25–0.42). The QOLCE‐55 demonstrated partial measurement equivalence at the level of strict invariance – χ 2 (2,823) = 3,727.9, CFI = 0.961, TLI = 0.962, RMSEA = 0.049 (0.044, 0.053), WRMR = 1.834. Significance The findings provide support for the factor structure of the QOLCE‐55 and contribute to its robust psychometric profile as a reliable and valid measure. Researchers and health practitioners should consider the QOLCE‐55 as a viable option for reducing respondent burden when assessing health‐related quality of life in children with epilepsy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.989

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEpilepsiaSame topicEpilepsy research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207