MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2588241938 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/now212.794

STMC-31. STIMULATION OF MICROGLIA AND MACROPHAGES AND GROWTH ATTENUATION OF BRAIN TUMOR-INITIATING CELLS WITH TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR-ALPHA

2016· article· en· W2588241938 on OpenAlexaff
Candice C. Poon, Susobhan Sarkar, Michael Blough, J. Gregory Cairncross, V. Wee Yong, John J. Kelly

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmune cells in cancer
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Cancer ResearchUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrogliaTumor necrosis factor alphaCancer researchBiologyStem cellPopulationImmunologyCytotoxic T cellCell biologyInflammationIn vitroMedicineGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microglia and macrophages (M/Ms) are functionally plastic entities that are compelled by glioblastoma (GBM) to adopt anti-inflammatory phenotypes and become major players in GBM progression. Understanding how to reverse this compulsion and maintain a pro-inflammatory tumor microenvironment is critical to developing effective therapeutics for GBM. Our studies have uncovered that GBM-associated M/Ms (GAM/Ms) can be pharmacologically compelled to shed the influence of GBM and secrete inhibitory factors that decrease the proliferation of GBM stem cell (GSC) lines and xenografts (Nature Neurosci 17:46-55, 2014). GSCs are a cellular reservoir that support GBM treatment resistance so it is important to development therapeutics that target this population. Our recent studies show that the most potent M/M-secreted factor behind GSC inhibition is tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF). We found that TNF decreases GSC proliferation and self-renewal through cytotoxic effects as well as G1 cell cycle arrest. TNF also induces differentiation in molecularly diverse GSCs. Additionally, we found that TNF can compel freshly-isolated human GAM/Ms to adopt a pro-inflammatory phenotype and inhibit GSCs in co-culture. The TNF receptors, TNFR1/2, are differentially expressed on GSCs and M/Ms. TNFR1, associated with apoptosis, is expressed by GSCs, while TNFR2, associated with survival mechanisms, is expressed on GAM/Ms. Moreover, TNFR1 on GSCs co-labels with OLIG2, one of the most specific markers of stemness in GBM, supporting the notion that TNF can target GSCs. Normal brain expresses low to non-existent levels of TNFR1, lending further support to this notion. Given the lack of studies investigating the effect of TNF on GSCs and the immunomodulatory effects TNF can exert on GAM/Ms, we feel it is a promising strategy to harness the effects of this powerful pro-inflammatory cytokine against GBM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-OncologySame topicImmune cells in cancerFrench-language works237,207