MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2588283859 · doi:10.21577/1984-6835.20170021

Recent Advances in Designing Hydrogels from Chitin and Chitin-Derivatives and their Impact on Environment and Agriculture: A Review

2017· review· en· W2588283859 on OpenAlexaff
Antonio G.B. Pereira, Alessandro F. Martins, Alexandre Tadeu Paulino, André R. Fajardo, Marcos R. Guilherme, Maria Graciela Iecher Faria, Giani Andréa Linde, Adley F. Rubira, Edvani C. Muniz

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Virtual de Química · 2017
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNanocomposite Films for Food Packaging
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChitinSelf-healing hydrogelsChitosanNanotechnologyAridEnvironmental scienceBiochemical engineeringChemistryMaterials scienceEnvironmental chemistryEcologyBiologyEngineeringOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Our purpose is to show and discuss the most relevant data on the synthesis approach and the characterization of hydrogels based on chitin and chitin-derivatives, such as chitosan, as well as their applications in several materials technologies. The current and future relevance of materials based on chitin, chitosan and derivatives have been verified by the impressive number of scientific and technological publications (both papers and patents) that appears day-by-day. The hydrogels, which show half liquid-like and half solid-like properties, have become a great promise for applications where the efficient use of water is essential to improve the physical-chemical properties of the arid soils. They are also effective in treatment of waters contaminated with dyes, lead cadmium, mercury, nickel, and so on, minimizing the environmental impact.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Virtual de QuímicaSame topicNanocomposite Films for Food PackagingFrench-language works237,207