MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) and Recurrent Mutations in the Hyaluronan Synthase 1 (HAS1) Gene May Predispose to Multiple Myeloma (MM) and Waldenstrom’s Macroglobulinemia (WM).

2005· article· en· W2588347050 on OpenAlexaff
Sophia Adamia, S P Treon, Daniel Santos, Zachary R. Hunter, Michael J. Mant, Tony Reiman, Andrew R. Belch, Linda M. Pilarski

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicFibroblast Growth Factor Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExonBiologyRNA splicingSingle-nucleotide polymorphismIntronExonic splicing enhancerMolecular biologyGenePolypyrimidine tractGeneticsCancer researchAlternative splicingGenotypeRNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The hyaluronan synthase 1 (HAS1) gene, which maps to chromosomal location 19 q3.14 undergoes aberrant intronic splicing in malignant B cells from MM and WM patients. We previously detected up-regulation of HAS1 gene in MM and WM, and identified three aberrantly spliced transcripts of this gene, termed HAS1Va, HAS1Vb and HAS1Vc. With a much larger patient cohort, statistical analysis of samples taken from 201 untreated MM patients showed that expression of HAS1Vb strongly correlates with poor survival (P=0.005). Furthermore, for MM patients with lytic bone disease, those patients having both lytic lesions and expression of HAS1Vb had statistically shorter survival than those with lytic lesions but lacking HAS1Vb (p=0.02). Our gene expression analysis at the single cell level demonstrates that 76–97% of individual CD20+ IgM+ WM cells obtained from BM aspirates and PBMC expressed HAS1Va or HAS1Vb variants. Exon skipping and partial intron retention in the HAS1 gene, detected in WM and MM cells, can result from activation of cryptic splicing elements. In turn, activation of cryptic splicing elements can be promoted by mutations, including SNPs, which serve as frequent genetic markers along the chromosome. We analyzed the frequency of the HAS1 833 A/G SNP located upstream of alternatively spliced exon 4, on exon 3. Bioinformatic analysis demonstrated that HAS1 833 A/G SNP overlaps with an exonic splicing enhancer motif of HAS1 and in the mutated allele this exonic splicing enhancer is abrogated. The genotype of G/G and A/G was found respectively in 90% and 10% of 60 WM cases, 85% and 15% of 117 MM cases and 40% and 60% of 90 cancer-free cases. Our results demonstrate that the genotype G/G is significantly more frequent in WM and MM patients than in cancer free controls (p=0.0001for WM and p= 0.00003 MM). The genotype A/A was not detected in any of the 267 individuals tested to date, and is presumed lethal. Further, in MM and WM B cells, we identified recurrent mutations on HAS1 intron 4 that include alterations of a key splicing element, polypyrimidine tract that creates and/or activates a new splice site in precisely the position required for the splicing events that create HAS1Vb. Bioinformatic analysis indicates that these recurrent genomic variations in intron 4 alter splisosome assembly, leading to aberrant splicing of HAS1 and the predicted impact on malignant disease and patient survival. We speculate that SNPs in HAS1 provide the predisposing elements for MM and WM, and additional mutations within the genome of emerging malignant B cells are required for progression to malignant disease. Thus, aberrant splicing of the HAS1 gene in MM and MW patients may results from the presence of polymorphisms and recurrent mutations in the HAS1 gene. Our genotyping analysis suggests that SNPs and mutations in the HAS1 gene may contribute to oncogenic events in WM or MM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.111
Threshold uncertainty score0.682

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicFibroblast Growth Factor ResearchFrench-language works237,207