MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2588522141 · doi:10.1109/tvlsi.2017.2661754

Preweighted Linearized VCO Analog-to-Digital Converter

2017· article· en· W2588522141 on OpenAlexafffund
Karama M. Al-Tamimi, Kamal El‐Sankary

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersCMC Microsystems
KeywordsVoltage-controlled oscillatorElectronic engineeringResistorEngineeringLinearizationVoltageControl theory (sociology)Digital-to-analog converterIntegral nonlinearityTopology (electrical circuits)ConvertersTotal harmonic distortionNonlinear systemElectrical engineeringComputer sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A linearization technique of voltage-to-frequency characteristics of voltage-controlled oscillator (VCO) analog-to-digital converters (ADCs) is presented. In contrast to previous works, the proposed technique is an open-loop calibration-free configuration, so it can operate at higher frequencies. It is also independent of the delay element structure, so it can be applied to various VCO ADC topologies. The analog input signal is first mapped through a preweighted resistor network in which every delay element experiences a different version of the input and produces the corresponding delay. As a result, the proposed approach suppresses the impact of V/F nonlinearity on the ADC performance by expanding a linear region of the transfer curve over the full rail-to-rail input. This technique shows substantial improvement results by keeping nonlinearity within ±0.5% over the full input scale (dBFS) and achieves a peak signal-to-noise and distortion ratio (SNDR) of 75.7 and 60.4 dB for input of -8 and 0 dBFS, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.981
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) SystemsSame topicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207