MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on bone resorption marker beta C-telopeptide (B-CTX) in postmenopausal women

2009· article· en· W2588546205 on OpenAlexaff
Simak Ali, J. W. Chapman, Laurence M. Demers, L. E. Shepherd, Limin Han, C. Wilson, K. I. Pritchard, Kim Leitzel, Michaël Pollak, Allan Lipton

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone health and treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityQueen's UniversityUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineChemotherapyInternal medicineBone resorptionBreast cancerBone remodelingOncologyGastroenterologyCancerEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

594 Background: In NCIC CTG MA.14, a randomized trial of tamoxifen versus tamoxifen + octreotide LAR, we found a measure of bone resorption, serum B-CTx, to be significantly associated with bone-only first recurrence. Administration of chemotherapy was permitted, and chemotherapy was a stratification factor (never, concurrent, sequential). It was unclear whether pretrial B-CTx serum levels would be affected by prior administration of chemotherapy, and whether timing of chemotherapy was associated with who had bone only, or bone and other site relapse. Methods: Serum B-CTx concentration (Serum CrossLaps Nordic Biosciences, Copenhagen, DN) was determined pretrial therapy in 621 of 667 primary breast cancer patients on MA.14. We tested for differences in continuous B-CTx levels in those who had assessment before (any) chemotherapy (included those who had none) versus those who were assessed after chemotherapy with an ANOVA test. We also used exact Fisher tests to examine whether there was an association between timing of (any) chemotherapy and 1) B-CTx values in upper 2.5% range for healthy pre-menopausal women; 2) bone only recurrence; and 3) concurrent bone and other relapse. Results: Serum B-CTx was assessed before (any) chemotherapy on 382/621 (61.5%) of patients, and after chemotherapy on 239/621 (38.5%). There were no significant differences in serum B-CTx values (p = 0.27). We found 92/621 (14.8%) of patients had high serum B-CTx levels compared with healthy pre-menopausal women; similar proportions of these women received chemotherapy after B-CTx assessment (p = 0.42). Furthermore, there were no differences in timing of (any) chemotherapy and those who had bone only recurrence (p = 0.48) or bone and other type of relapse (p = 0.76). Conclusions: Chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting had no significant effect on bone resorption marker B-CTX serum levels. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.460
Teacher spread0.414 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicBone health and treatments→French-language works237,207→