Of Montreal e Georges Bataille: a construção de uma narrativa pop
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RESUMO: A banda americana of Montreal sempre se notabilizou pelo intenso diálogo com textos literários em suas letras. A prática se manteve em seu oitavo disco de estúdio, Hissing fauna, are you the destroyer?, lançado em 2007, quando o diálogo estabelecido com a novela História do olho (1928), do escritor francês Georges Bataille, se apresenta como um elemento chave para a construção dos personagens nas composições musicais. Após a menção a Bataille, o protagonista retratado pela voz narrativa das canções é transformado, assim como o tom das músicas, que passa da depressão à euforia. A partir da análise das letras e da comparação com cenas e temas tratados no livro, este artigo se desenvolve sustentado na relação que a músicapop firma com os ouvintes, baseando-se em trabalhos de teoria e crítica sobre o assunto.PALAVRAS-CHAVE: of Montreal. Georges Bataille. Literatura Comparada. Música popular americana. Literatura francesa.ABSTRACT: The American band of Montreal has always been noted for the intense dialogue with literary texts in their lyrics. This practice was kept in their eighth studio album, Hissing fauna, are you the destroyer?, released in 2007, when the dialogue established with French writer Georges Bataille's novella Story of the eye (1928), is presented as a key element for the construction of characters in the musical compositions. After Bataille is mentioned, the protagonist that is being depicted in the songs is transformed, and so is the tone of songs, which go from depression to euphoria. Starting from the analysis of lyrics and comparison with scenes and themes being dealt with in the book, this article is developed based on the relation that pop music secures with listeners, leaning on theoretical and critical works on the subject.KEYWORDS: of Montreal. Georges Bataille. Comparative Literature. American Popular Music. French Literature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".