MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2588652273

PBS software: maps, spatial analysis, and other utilities

2003· article· en· W2588652273 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rowan Haigh, Nicholas M. Boers, Jon T. Schnute

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Analysis with R
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoftwareGeographic coordinate systemGeographic information systemDocumentationComputer scienceSpatial analysisSoftware engineeringMercator projectionGeographyDatabaseComputer graphics (images)CartographyProgramming languageRemote sensing
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Schnute, J.T., N.M. Boers, and R. Haigh. 2003. PBS software: maps, spatial analysis, and other utilities. Can. Tech. Rep. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2496: viii + 82 p. This report describes software written to facilitate the compilation and analysis of fishery data, particularly data referenced by spatial coordinates. Our research stems from experiences with information on Canada’s Pacific groundfish fisheries compiled at the Pacific Biological Station (PBS). Despite its origins in fishery data analysis, our software has broad applicability. The library PBS Mapping extends the languages R and S-PLUS to include two-dimensional plotting features similar to those commonly available in a Geographic Information System (GIS). Embedded C code speeds algorithms from computational geometry, such as finding polygons that contain specified point events or converting between longitude-latitude and Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) coordinates. We also present a number of convenient utilities for the Microsoft Windows operating systems, including commands that support computational geometry outside the framework of R or S-PLUS. Tools to construct most of our software come freely from the Internet, as documented here in a guide to the packages available. Furthermore, we provide quick tutorials that address key technical issues relevant to our work, such as embedding C code into an R package and writing documentation that meets the R standard. Our results, which depend significantly on the work of students, illustrate the convergence of goals between academic training and applied research. RESUME Schnute, J.T., N.M. Boers, and R. Haigh. 2003. PBS software: maps, spatial analysis, and other utilities. Can. Tech. Rep. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2496: viii + 82 p. Ce rapport presente un logiciel concu pour faciliter la compilation et l’analyse de donnees sur la peche, particulierement de donnees georeferencees. Notre recherche decoule de notre experience de la compilation de donnees sur la peche du poisson de fond dans le Pacifique a la Station biologique du Pacifique (SBP). Bien qu’il ait ete concu pour analyser des donnees sur la peche, notre logiciel est d’application tres generale. La cartotheque logicielle PBS Mapping permet de developper les langages R et S-PLUS afin qu’ils comprennent des capacites de tracage bidimensionnel semblables a celles disponibles couramment dans un systeme d’information geographique (SIG). Le langage C permet d’accelerer les algorithmes geometriques, comme ceux qui permettent de rechercher des polygones comportant des evenements ponctuels precis ou de convertir des coordonnees geographiques en coordonnees de Mercator transverse universelle. Nous presentons egalement un certain nombre d’applications pratiques pour les systemes d’exploitation Windows de Microsoft, y compris des commandes de geometrie algorithmique a l’exterieur du cadre des langages R et S-PLUS. Les outils utilises pour mettre au point la plupart de nos logiciels sont disponibles gratuitement sur Internet, tel que souligne dans un guide des progiciels disponibles presente dans ce document. De plus, nous offrons de courts didacticiels qui traitent des principales questions techniques liees a notre travail, comme l’integration de code C dans un progiciel en langage R et la redaction de documents qui satisfont a la norme du langage R. Nos resultats, qui dependent grandement du travail d’etudiants, illustrent la convergence des objectifs de la formation academique et de la recherche appliquee.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.281
Threshold uncertainty score0.941

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0070.009
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.006
Open science0.0060.005
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2810.294

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicData Analysis with RFrench-language works237,207