MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2588705940 · doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckw167.012

Impacts of Canadian drinking age laws on sexual assault victimization of young women, 2009-2013

2016· article· en· W2588705940 on OpenAlexaffabout
JM Gatley, Marcos Sanches, Russell C. Callaghan

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Public Health · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSex work and related issues
Canadian institutionsPublic Health OntarioUniversity of TorontoUniversity of Northern British ColumbiaCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSexual assaultOccupational safety and healthSuicide preventionInjury preventionHuman factors and ergonomicsCriminologyPoison controlPsychologyMedical emergencyMedicinePolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Minimum legal drinking age (MLDA) laws are a widely used and effective strategy for reducing alcohol-related harms among youth. In Canada, the MLDA is 18 years in Alberta, Manitoba, and Québec (MLDA-18), and 19 years in the rest of the country (MLDA-19). Recently, experts have called for a national increase in the MLDA to 21 years. Few studies have examined the potential impacts of drinking-age laws on patterns of violent sexual victimization. The current study addresses this gap. Methods Regression discontinuity analyses utilizing data on police-reported sexual assault victimization incidents from Canada’s national Uniform Crime Reporting Survey (UCR), 2009-2013. Results For women just older than the MLDA, sexual assault victimization at any location increased in MLDA-19 provinces [22.5% (1.2%-43.4%) P = 0.039], compared to women just younger. Sexual victimization of women at bars and restaurants also increased in MLDA-18 provinces by 107.5% (95% CI 16.2%-201.1%; P = 0.021), and nationally by 69.2% (95% CI 1.1%-139.2%; P = 0.046), as well as at open air settings in MLDA-19 provinces by 35.4% (95% CI 5.9%-64.9%; P = 0.019) and nationally by 23.2% (95% CI 3.7%-42.7%; P = 0.020). Sexual assault victimizations by strangers also increased at bars/restaurants in MLDA-18 provinces [356.9% (95% CI 89.8%-631.2%; P = 0.009)] and nationally [189.0% (95% CI 63.3%-320.0%; P = 0.003)]; and in open air settings in MLDA-19 provinces [41.4% (95% CI 12.0%-71.3%; P = 0.006)]. Conclusions Immediately after the drinking age, young women experienced significant and immediate increases in sexual assault victimization. Increases were observed specifically at public settings associated with drinking venues. The results are supportive of the potential for MLDA laws to reduce harms related to sexual violence experienced by young women, and also highlight the importance of drinking context for informing interventions to reduce alcohol-related sexual assault. Key messages: This study provides the first evidence of the impact of drinking age laws on police reported sexual assault victimization among young women. Exit from Canadian legal drinking age laws was associatedwith increases in police-reported sexual assault victimization of young women, especially at public drinking settings

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score0.505

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0060.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Public Health→Same topicSex work and related issues→French-language works237,207→