Recent Studies in Elizabeth Cary (1994‐2014, with additional items from 2015)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although scholars continue to focus chiefly on Cary's Tragedy of Mariam (1613), they have largely moved beyond the biographical approaches of the 1980s and 1990s to situate the play in relation to early modern discourses of religion, politics, gender, genre, and race, while also considering the play's potential effects in the modern theater and classroom. Mariam criticism is energized by dynamic debates not only about Cary's religio‐political allegiances but also about the meanings generated by the play's complex, multivalent perspectives. While Edward II was printed in different octavo and folio versions in 1680, recent work on the consanguineous manuscripts underlying them may suggest Elizabeth Cary's authorship of both. The folio History of the Life, Reign and Death of Edward II, more easily attributed to Elizabeth Cary, has been approached both as a timely intervention in contemporary politics and as an expression of Cary's own experiences. If there is still work to be done on Cary's writings beyond Mariam–on the manuscripts underlying Edward II, and on her translations, letters, and epitaphs–her original play and her History will doubtless continue to generate new interpretations. [C.L. and R.S.]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".