“Health Promoting Judicial Youth Protection”: the commitment of a French institution since 2013
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Judicial Youth Protection (JYP) Directorate ensures the application of judgments rendered by the French children's courts. In a given month, its 1300 structures take care of 40 000 juvenile offenders. They often present medical and social vulnerabilities, and high-risk behavior. In 2013, the JYP, yet a non-medical institution, has decided to develop a health promotion program in order to address the young persons’ global health determinants. The point is to involve all parties: from the practitioners in the field with the minors, to the decision makers. The goal is to provide the social actors of the JYP with the necessary assistance to include health promotion in their educational mission and go beyond providing only healthcare. The physical and psychosocial environments (including the professionals’ wellbeing), the user participation and their life skills, are targeted for them to become more favorable to health. The strong political backing includes a transversal engagement (financial services, human resources) and a double movement from bottom to top, and top to bottom. A framework, based on the Ottawa Charters’ 5 fields, was built in participative workshops to structure the action of the 9 regional judicial youth protection directorates, coordinated by the central administration. Many partnerships have been developed with some health policy actors, and particularly with the health promotion and education associations. The first outputs are a widening in actors’ health representation, an increasing professional commitment in health actions (nutrition, sports, drug use, violence, sleeping problems, personal hygiene), new partnerships and a new dynamic to improve work-life quality. The “health promoting JYP” is still at its beginning but it seems positive that this type of ministerial institution is able to promote health in a country that is still far from adopting a global health promotion policy. Key messages: Juvenile youth protection social workers are also health actors for the “health promoting JYP”, even if they are not totally aware of it Health promotion is now seen in French Juvenile Youth Protection not only as a useful tool for health improvement, but also as a tool for educative achievement, useful to support social reinsertion
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.018 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".