MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2588861535 · doi:10.1093/jhps/hnw030.048

Acetabular Bone Density Decreases Following Surgical Correction of FAI Deformities

2016· article· en· W2588861535 on OpenAlexaff
Paul E. Beaulé, Tiffany Dang, Andrew Speirs

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hip Preservation Surgery · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOrthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOrthodontics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

FDA Status: Not Applicable Summary: This study showed a decrease in BMD in the acetabular rim at two-year follow-up of patients who underwent corrective surgery for a symptomatic cam FAI deformity. Purpose: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is caused by deformities of the hip joint which may result in repeated abnormal contact in the joint leading to osteoarthritis. Increased acetabular subchondral bone density was found symptomatic subjects with cam-type deformities as well as in asymptomatic subjects with cam deformities who may be in early stages of degeneration. Increased bone density due to abnormal hip contact and bone remodeling may play an important role in the pathogensis of hip OA. The cam deformity may be surgically removed using minimally invasive techniques, although the long-term clinical results are unknown. The purpose of this study was to examine the change in bone mineral density (BMD) following surgical removal of the cam deformity. Methods: Twenty patients undergoing surgical correction of a symptomatic cam deformity were recruited. Prior to surgery and two years after surgery, bilateral quantitative CT scans of the hip were performed on all patients, including a CT calibration phantom. Image resolution was 0.8 to 0.9 mm in-plane with 0.625 mm slice thickness. Pre-operative CT images were segmented and divided into six wedge-shaped regions around the superior acetabulum. A tetrahedral mesh was created in each wedge to define sampling points in the CT image and the image intensity was converted to BMD using the calibration phantom. The average BMD was then calculated in each wedge in each of three levels based on the depth from the acetabular rim i.e. rim, mid-level and medial wall. For follow-up BMD the mesh was transformed based on a rigid registration to define the sampling points in the follow-up CT. The change in BMD was assessed in each region and significance was tested using a paired-sample t-test. The study was reviewed and approved by the hospital research ethics board. Results: To date, eleven patients have undergone follow-up CT scan. BMD decreased by 33 g/cc to 64 g/cc in the rim level of the superior acetabulum, or -5.0 to -9.5% (Figure 2). Significant changes were seen in wedges 1 (anterior), 4 and 5 (p < 0.05). A decrease was also seen in wedges 2 and 3 but was not significant (p = 0.13 and p = 0.15). Changes in the middle level were smaller and were not significant (p = 0.053 to 0.81). Conclusions: This study showed a decrease in BMD in the acetabular rim at two-year follow-up of patients who underwent corrective surgery for a symptomatic cam FAI deformity. Subchondral sclerosis is a recognized feature of OA and the high pre-operative BMD may be a bone remodeling response from abnormal contact. The subsequent post-operative decrease in BMD suggests remodeling under more normal joint contact mechanics. This change towards normal bone tissue is encouraging and supports the joint preserving surgical treatment of cam FAI deformities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.081
Threshold uncertainty score0.253

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Hip Preservation SurgerySame topicOrthopaedic implants and arthroplastyFrench-language works237,207