Detecting viable Pseudogymnoascus destructans (Ascomycota: Pseudeurotiaceae) from walls
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pseudogymnoascus destructans (Pd) causes the fungal disease white-nose syndrome (WNS), which has led to high mortality in some hibernating bat species in eastern North America. The ability to detect viable Pd in hibernacula is important for understanding the role the environment plays as a reservoir for infectious Pd. Previous studies have generally used the high-sugar medium Sabouraud-dextrose (SAB) and have had low yields of viable Pd from environmental samples of Pd-positive hibernacula. While cultureindependent methods (i.e., molecular genetics) have previously shown much better success in detecting Pd, these methods cannot determine viability. In 2012 and 2015, we swabbed walls in four hibernacula with WNS-positive bats in New Brunswick, Canada, and cultured the samples using dextrose-peptone-yeast extract agar (DPYA), SAB, and Malt extract (MEA) media. Samples cultured on DPYA produced viable Pd 43.7 to 50.0 % more frequently than SAB, with a maximum overall return for DPYA among sites of 62.5 % Pd-positive samples over both years. During the initial outbreak of WNS in our study region, Pd-positive swabs were produced from 40.0 to 83.3 % of samples on DPYA, whereas SAB produced a maximum of 40.0 %. At one site we detected Pd from 83.3% of swabs cultured on DPYA and 0 % on SAB. MEA produced no viable Pd. Our figures for Pd detection are as high as or higher than previously published culture-independent methods, while also confirming the viability of the Pd present. We found that the yield of viable Pd from hibernacula walls decreased from 2012 to 2015 as the hibernating bat population decreased due to WNS mortality, but patterns varied amongst hibernacula, and overall, were not statistically different. It is possible that environmental growth of Pd contributes to its persistence within hibernacula. We suggest that future studies on the environmental persistence of viable Pd discontinue the use of high-sugar media that lack inhibitory fungal growth ingredients, such as SAB and MEA, as they favor fast-growing fungal species that overgrow and mask slowergrowing fungi such as Pd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".