MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2588921932 · doi:10.5006/c2003-03294

The Ministry of Transportation of Ontario’S Experience with Electrochemical Chloride Extraction (ECE) 1989-2002

2003· article· en· W2588921932 on OpenAlexaffabout
F. Pianca, H. Schell, David Lai, R. Raven

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicConcrete Corrosion and Durability
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Transportation of Ontario
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChristian ministryChlorideExtraction (chemistry)ElectrochemistryEnvironmental scienceMaterials scienceMetallurgyPolitical scienceChemistryElectrodeChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The corrosion of steel reinforcement in concrete highway structures involves electrochemical reactions and as such can be arrested by electrochemical means such as cathodic protection or electrochemical chloride extraction (ECE). The ECE method is typically similar to cathodic protection in that it involves application of current. It requires the installation of a temporary anode (5 - 8 weeks) on the surface of the concrete and the passage of direct current between the anode and the steel reinforcement which serves as the cathode. The current density of the ECE process is approximately 100 times the current density used in conventional cathodic protection. The Ministry of Transportation of Ontario (MTO) first used ECE on an experimental basis in 1989. More recently, the Ministry has specified ECE on conventional contractor-bid contracts to mitigate the effect of corrosion distress on 5 piers and 1 abutment at the Burlington Bay Skyway in Burlington and 12 bridge abutments in North Bay, Ontario. Evaluation of ECE by the Ministry has indicated variable performance. Performance as expected, meeting the −250 mV static potential criterion specified by the Ministry has been documented on some structures but not on others. The reason for this variable performance is not yet well understood. The paper will review variables such as total ampere hours passed, depth of concrete cover, depth of chloride corrosion threshold relative to the reinforcement, steel current density compared to concrete current density and corrosion potentials prior to and after treatment. Rate of corrosion measurements by the linear polarization technique will also be presented as well as concrete resistivity readings prior to and after treatment. The paper will attempt to identify parameters that predict the probability of success of the ECE treatment. Typical costs experienced on the Ministry’s ECE contracts to date will also be reported.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.120
Threshold uncertainty score0.241

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicConcrete Corrosion and DurabilityFrench-language works237,207