MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2588940498 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofw172.929

Clinical Outcomes of Achromobacter Species in Adult Cystic Fibrosis Patients: A Cohort Study

2016· article· en· W2588940498 on OpenAlexaffabout
Brett Edwards, Ranjani Somayaji, Jasper Wong, Harvey Rabin, Michael D. Parkins

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInfections and bacterial resistance
Canadian institutionsAlberta Health ServicesUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCystic fibrosisCohortPathogenic organismAchromobacterInternal medicineCohort studyMicrobiologyGeneticsBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background. The clinical significance of lung infection in cystic fibrosis (CF) due to classic pathogens is well established. However, Achromobacter species are Gram-negative pathogens increasingly recognized in CF with unclear clinical impact as the evidence is restricted to small European studies. Methods. We conducted a cohort study of CF patients attending a Canadian CF clinic who cultured Achromobacter species in their sputum between 1984 and 2015 to assess the prevalence and clinical impact of infection. Achromobacter was categorized as intermittent (minimum 1 positive culture) or chronic infection (≥2 positive cultures) in the preceding 12 months. Data was collected for a 2-year period prior to and following first Achromobacter isolation. Primary outcome was the proportion of patients with pulmonary exacerbation (PEx) at time of first isolation. Next, those with chronic infection were matched with 2:1 age and sex-matched controls with no history of Achromobacter infection. Multivariable mixed effects models were used to assess rate of PEx and lung function decline. Results. There were 34 patients (11% of clinical cohort) with median age 24.8 (IQR 20.6–30.8) and median BMI of 19.4 kg/m2 (IQR 18.1–22.1) included. Of these, 10 patients (29%) developed chronic infection in the study period, though they did not differ in baseline lung function. 14 patients (41%; 95% CI 25-58%) had a PEx at first isolation and of these, 4 (29%) were severe PEx. Achromobacter isolates displayed multi-drug resistance with resistance rates of 80% to aztreonam, 86% to tobramycin, and 43% to ticarcillin. There was no association of infection with rate of PEx or lung function decline in the total cohort (pre- versus post-index infection) or in the matched cohort. Conclusion. In this Canadian CF cohort, Achromobacter species infection was associated with frequent PEx, including severe PEx, at time of initial isolation but not with increased subsequent PEx risk or lung function decline. Larger multi-center studies are required to further understand the impact of Achromobacter infection in CF. Disclosures. All authors: No reported disclosures

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.438

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicInfections and bacterial resistanceFrench-language works237,207