MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2588973060 · doi:10.1093/ndt/gfw141.01

MO059RISK FACTORS FOR SEVERE RENAL DISEASE IN BARDET-BIEDL SYNDROME - PHENOTYPIC AND GENOTYPIC ANALYSES OF THE LARGEST REPORTED AFFECTED COHORT

2016· article· en· W2588973060 on OpenAlexaff
David Goldsmith, Elizabeth Forsythe, David V. Milford, Detlef Böckenhauer, Lukas Foggensteiner, Phillip Beales

Bibliographic record

VenueNephrology Dialysis Transplantation · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases
Canadian institutionsSt. Thomas Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBardet–Biedl syndromeCohortPediatricsDiseasePhenotypeGenotypeKidney diseaseInternal medicineGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction and Aims: The high frequency of renal disease in BBS - a rare autosomal recessive ciliopathy characterised by rod cone dystrophy, renal malformations, learning difficulties, obesity, post-axial polydactyly and hypogonadism - is a cause of great anxiety among patients due to the devastating effect this can have on quality of life, morbidity and mortality. Nineteen disease causing genes have been identified (BBS1-BBS19) in the last two decades coding for proteins that localise to the cilia or the basal body. Sequencing of known disease causing genes confirms a clinical diagnosis of BBS in around 80% of patients. The primary renal phenotype is highly variable ranging from cystic tubular disease, dysplastic renal disease and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis to concentrating defects. Secondary renal disease may occur as a consequence of hypertension and diabetes which are frequently observed in this population. Methods: Three hundred and fifty patients attended the adult and paediatric national BBS clinics in Birmingham and London over a four year period (2010-14). All patients were clinically examined, and genotyped, most were subjected to renal imaging, blood and urine testing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNephrology Dialysis TransplantationSame topicGenetic and Kidney Cyst DiseasesFrench-language works237,207