MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2589113031 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/now212.176

CSIG-15. CIC REGULATES NEURAL STEM/PROGENITOR PROLIFERATION AND DIFFERENTIATION

2016· article· en· W2589113031 on OpenAlexaff
Shiekh Tanveer Ahmad, Alexandra Rogers, Rajiv Dixit, Samuel O. Lawn, Myra Joy Chen, Lata Adnani, Mana Alshehri, Stephen M. Robbins, Carol Schuurmans, Gregory Cairncross, Jennifer A. Chan

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProgenitor cellNeural stem cellBiologyStem cellProgenitorLineage (genetic)Cell biologyOligodendrocyteCell fate determinationNeural developmentCancer researchLoss functionRegulatorGeneticsGenePhenotypeNeuroscienceTranscription factorCentral nervous systemMyelin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Capicua (Cic) is an evolutionarily conserved HMG box-containing transcriptional repressor. Mutations in the CIC gene (encoded on human chr 19q) have been found in a diverse range of human cancers, but are most striking in their association with oligodendrogliomas (ODGs), where tumor cells bear resemblance to immature oligodendrocytes or OPCs. CIC mutations are present in two thirds of ODGs and occur in the setting of concurrent 1p/19q loss and IDH1/2 mutation. Although its link to ODGs is established, little is known of the role that Cic plays during normal cortical development or how its loss may contribute to gliomagenesis. Here, we examine the relationship between CIC expression and cell identity in the developing mouse brain and begin to determine its importance in the regulation of proliferation and cell fate of cortical progenitors. We found strong nuclear localization in mature cells of astrocytic and neuronal lineages but weaker or absent nuclear localization in stem cells and oligodendroglial lineage cells. CIC loss-of-function studies showed increased proliferative and self-renewal capacity of neural stem/progenitor populations in vitro and in vivo. In addition, CIC loss biased cultured neural stem cells away from neuronal and astrocytic lineages and toward the oligodendrocyte lineage. Our data further suggest an overproduction of OPCs from cells in which CIC is lost. Taken together, our results indicate that CIC is an important regulator of fate decisions in neural development and suggest that its loss may contribute to oligodendroglioma formation by both dysregulating proliferation and by promoting an OPC-like identity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-Oncology→Same topicNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms→French-language works237,207→