MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2589160901 · doi:10.18806/tesl.v33i0.1249

Giving Refugee Students a Strong Head Start: The LEAD Program

2017· article· en· W2589160901 on OpenAlex
Joan Miles, Mary Catherine Bailey-McKenna

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueTESL Canada Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and experiences of immigrants and refugees
Canadian institutionsThinkpath Engineering Services (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHead startRefugeePedagogyGriefPsychologySociologyHumanitiesPolitical scienceDevelopmental psychologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As the complexity and cultural diversity in contemporary Canadian schools increases, educators are challenged to respond to the unique cultural, socioemotional, and learning needs of students whose families are fleeing hardship, global conflict, or persecution to seek safe haven in Canada. Like those in most major urban centres in Canada, schools in Calgary have received many newcomer students as families settle into their new lives. Teachers are tasked with providing high-quality education to learners from multiple language bases with limited formal education, little or no English, and histories of loss, grief, and/or trauma. The complexity of this task often requires a multidisciplinary team approach to support the teacher and address unique student needs. This article, written by an ESL teacher and a psychologist, provides an overview of one program that helps set the stage for success in Canadian classrooms. The LEAD program uses a three- pronged approach to foster successful inclusion, an approach comprising English language development, trauma-informed practice, and cultural responsiveness. L’augmentation de la complexité et de la diversité culturelle dans les écoles canadiennes met au dé les enseignants qui doivent réagir aux besoins uniques culturels, socio-émotionnels et pédagogiques de leurs élèves dont les familles fuient des difficultés, des con its mondiaux ou la persécution et cherchent refuge au Canada. Les écoles à Calgary, comme celles dans la plupart des grands centres urbains au Canada, ont accueilli plusieurs nouveaux élèves dont les familles s’installent dans leur nouvelle vie. Les enseignants sont chargés d’offrir une éducation de haute qualité aux apprenants ayant des bagages linguistiques divers et une scolarité formelle limitée, connaissant peu ou pas l’anglais et ayant subi des pertes, des chagrins et des traumatismes. La complexité de cette tâche exige souvent une approche collaborative et pluridisciplinaire pour appuyer l’enseignant et répondre aux besoins uniques des élèves. Cet article par une enseignante d’ALS et une psychologue présente un aperçu d’un programme qui prépare le terrain pour la réussite dans les salles de classe au Canada. Le programme LEAD repose sur une approche à trois volets qui favorise l’insertion en visant le développement de la langue anglaise et qui emploient des pratiques qui tiennent compte des traumatismes et qui sont adaptées à la culture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.652
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0070.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.410
Teacher spread0.369 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it