MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2589166858 · doi:10.1182/blood.v108.11.21.21

The Specificity and Isotype of Monoclonal Anti-D Antibodies Dictates Their Ability To Inhibit Opsonized Platelet Phagocytosis.

2006· article· en· W2589166858 on OpenAlexaff
John W. Semple, Rukhsana Aslam, Michael Kim, Edwin R. Speck, Donald I.H. Stewart, Erik Weirsma, John Freedman, Mimi Kjærsgaard

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood groups and transfusion
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOpsoninMonoclonal antibodyPhagocytosisIsotypePolyclonal antibodiesAntibodyMolecular biologyPlateletBiologyImmunoglobulin GImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The use of polyclonal anti-D is the established treatment for prophylaxis against rhesus immunization in Rh(D) negative pregnant women and is effective in raising the platelet counts in patients with autoimmune thrombocytopenic purpura (AITP). Since the supply of plasma derived anti-D antibodies is limited and plasma products carry the risk of infectious complications, replacement with monoclonal anti-D antibodies is a promising alternative. This study analyzed the efficacy of polyclonal anti-D (WinRho®SDF, Cangene) and six human monoclonal anti-D antibodies with differeing isotypes and specificities (Table 1) for their ability to opsonized erythrocytes and modulate monocyte phagocytosis of opsonized platelets in a flow cytometric assay. Human platelets were labeled with CellTracker CMGreen, opsonized with various HLA or HPA1a specific antibodies, incubated with the monocytic leukemic cell line THP-1 for 2 h and intracellular fluorescence was compared at 4°C and 37°C. Various concentrations of anti-D opsonized erythrocytes were added to the assay and the changes in intracellular fluorescence was compared. The results demonstrate that the THP cells significantly phagocytosed opsonized platelets in an Fc-dependent manner e.g. the fold change in median channel fluorescence between 37°C and 4°C for intact IgG W6/32 opsonized platelets was 51.5 ± 5.2 (mean+SD, n=74) and only 2.1+2.1 if the platelets were labeled with F(ab’)2 fragments. When erythrocytes were opsonized with the monoclonal anti-D antibodies that shared specificity but differed in IgG isotype (RhG1/RhG3 and BRAD3/BRAD5) and added to the assay, the IgG3 isotypes had a significantly greater ability to inhibit opsonized platelet phagocytosis compared with IgG1 isotypes and this inhibition was similar to that observed with polyclonal anti-D opsonized erythrocytes. However, in the one case where the monoclonal anti-D antibodies shared isotypes but differed in specificity (113/178), rRh9B8-113 monoclonal antibody significantly inhibited platelet phagocytosis whereas the rRh429-178 antibody did not. These results suggest that some human monoclonal antibodies can be as efficient as polyclonal anti-D in inhibiting opsonized platelet phagocytosis and the degree inhibition depends on the IgG isotype and specificity of the monoclonal antibodies. Thus, a defined cocktail of monoclonal anti-D antibodies could be prepared to mimic the effects and replace plasma-derived polyclonal anti-D. Table 1: Characteristic of the monoclonal anti-D antibodies. Antibody Isotype Specificity rRh9B8-113 IgG1 Loop 3 rRh429-178 IgG1 Loop 4 RhG1 IgG1 Loop 6 RhG3 IgG3 Loop 6 BRAD3 IgG3 Loop 6 BRAD5 IgG1 Loop 6

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.399

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicBlood groups and transfusionFrench-language works237,207