MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Hypofractionated radiotherapy (66Gy at 3Gy per fraction) for favorable-risk prostate cancer: Long-term outcomes.

2013· article· en· W2589285052 on OpenAlexaff
Nita Patel, Sergio Faria, Fabio Cury, Marc David, Marie Duclos, George Shenouda, Luís Souhami

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineProstate cancerRadiation therapyProstateGenitourinary systemToxicityHormonal therapyUrologySurgeryCancerInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

141 Background: Hypofractionated radiotherapy (HypoRT) is increasingly being used to treat prostate cancer to take advantage of its likely low α/β ratio. There is limited experience in delivering a high biologically equivalent dose with HypoRT. We report long-term outcomes from patients treated with high-dose HypoRT. Methods: Patients with low and intermediate risk prostate cancer were treated using 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy at a dose of 66Gy in 22 daily fractions of 3Gy without hormonal therapy. A uniform 7mm margin was created around the prostate for the planning target volume (PTV) and treatment was prescribed to the isocentre. Treatment was delivered using daily ultrasound image guided radiotherapy (IGRT). The CTCv3.0 was used to prospectively score toxicity. Biochemical failure was defined using the Phoenix criteria of nadir+2ng/ml. Results: A total of 129 patients were treated between November 2002 and December 2005. With a median follow-up of 90 months, the 5- and 8-year actuarial biochemical control rate was 97% and 92% respectively. The 5- and 8-year actuarial overall survival was 92% and 88% respectively. Only one patient died from prostate cancer at 92 months after treatment resulting in an 8-year actuarial cancer specific survival of 98%. Radiotherapy was well tolerated with 57% of patients experiencing no acute gastrointestinal (GI) or genitourinary (GU) toxicity. For late toxicity, the worst grade ≥2 rate for GI and GU toxicity was 27% and 33% respectively, but at the last follow-up the rate of grade ≥2 was only 1.5% for both GI and GU toxicity (Table). Conclusions: High dose HypoRT delivering 66 Gy in 22 fractions at 3Gy per fraction is a safe, effective and convenient modality of delivering radiotherapy to patients with favorable risk prostate cancer with excellent biochemical control rates and acceptable rates of acute and late GI and GU toxicity. [Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.132
GPT teacher head0.511
Teacher spread0.379 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research→French-language works237,207→