MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2589377736

CGIAR Annual General Meeting, Nairobi, Kenya, October 28 - 31, 2003 : Summary Record of Proceedings and Decisions

2003· other· en· W2589377736 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Cgiar Secretariat

Bibliographic record

VenueCGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) · 2003
Typeother
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies in Central America
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographyLibrary sciencePolitical scienceComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary report of the CGIAR annual general meeting 2003, held in Nairobi, Kenya from October 28 to October 31, Ian Johnson presiding. This report contains both the summary of the stakeholder meeting as well as the summary for the business meeting. Inaugural remarks were delivered by H.E. Moody Awori, Vice President of Kenya. The stakeholder meeting report section covers briefings on the Challenge Programs and the Reform Program, briefings on the achievements and impacts of Centers' work, the science awards, and the innovation marketplace. Also included are updates from the Science Council, the Private Sector Committee, GFAR and a description of the 2003 Crawford Memorial Lecture delivered by Susan Whelan, Canadian Minister for International Development. The Business Meeting section contains reports on the EPMR of ISNAR and its subsequent closure, governance transfer to IFPRI and move to SSA, the EPR and EMR of ICRISAT and IPGRI's EPMR. Creation of a Task Force to conduct a broader study on rationalization of CGIAR operations across the System starting with Africa, initially SSA was also tabled. Also on the Business Meeting agenda were the OED Meta-Evaluation study, the iSC/Science Council transition, a report from SPIA, and the CGIAR's financing plan for 2004.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.169
Threshold uncertainty score0.566

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.006
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1690.106

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research)Same topicHistorical Studies in Central AmericaFrench-language works237,207