SELECTING DISEASE RESISTANT PLANT MATERIAL FOR APPLE AND GRAPEVINE BREEDING
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Since the early 1960s, DPA has been the primary method to control superficial scald, a major disorder in stored apples and pears. In November 2009 the European Commission formally refused the inclusion of diphenylamine (DPA) and ethoxyquin into Annex I of Directive 91/414/EEC which lists its approved pesticides. This presentation will review the research and development of low O 2-based DCA technologies as a commercial replacement for DPA. Beginning with experiments that began over 110 years ago in 1903, research showed that superficial scald in apples and pears is entirely prevented by storage in very low O 2 concentrations, i.e., between 0 and 1% O 2. However, some of this work indicated that low O 2 fails to control or sometimes increases superficial scald. In addition, there was no reliable method to measure the lowest acceptable concentration and some research suggested that if the O 2 is too low for too long, fruit damage occurs. Lastly, controlled-atmosphere (CA) room construction and control was not always sufficient to maintain adequate low O 2 conditions (e.g., <1%). Therefore, the use of CA to control superficial scald was not embraced by industry. However, in the 1980s as CA room construction and gas control became more advanced, industry began testing low O 2 methods to replace DPA, e.g., 0.7% O 2 on 'Delicious' apple in British Columbia, Canada, initial low O 2 stress (ILOS) (various countries) and RLOS (repeated low O 2 stress with ethanol monitoring). The advent of DCA-Chlorophyll Fluorescence (DCA-CF) technology in 2001, which determines the lowest acceptable level of O 2 in storage, removed the fear of fermentation and low O 2 damage and gave the fruit industry more confidence to use DCA-CF (rather than DPA), for controlling superficial scald. Data will be shown on the transition to CA-based technologies to control superficial scald in the apple industry of South Tyrol, Italy, where DPA has not been used for 3 years. A new method is being tested called DCA-CF 'Extra' which may add extra scald prevention during shelf-life for very superficial scald-prone apples.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".