MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2589689353 · doi:10.1182/blood.v104.11.153.153

Multi-Log Clonal Ex-Vivo Expansion of Long Term Lympho-Myeloid Hematopoietic Stem Cells by Nup98-Hox Fusion Genes.

2004· article· en· W2589689353 on OpenAlexaff
Hideaki Ohta, Silvia Bakovic, Nicolas Pineault, Guy Sauvageau, R. Keith Humphries

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMesenchymal stem cell research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalInstitute for Research in Immunology and CancerBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStem cellHaematopoiesisHox geneBiologyMyeloidFusion geneEx vivoTransplantationCancer researchCell biologyMolecular biologyIn vitroGeneGeneticsGene expressionInternal medicineMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Expanding hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) ex vivo remains a major challenge due to differentiation. Previous studies have shown that engineered overexpression of HOXB4 increases HSCs >40-fold in short term liquid culture. Most recently we have demonstrated that overexpression of Hox genes of different paralogs fused to the N-terminal region of the nucleoporin98 (NUP98) gene, a common fusion partner of Hox in AML, causes a strong block in differentiation as reflected by marked increases in CFU-S output and lineage negative cell expansion in vitro (Pineault et al, MCB, 2004). NUP98 fusions of Abd-B like HOX genes, HOXA10 and HOXD13 (NA10 and ND13), are more potent in these effects than those of Antennepedia-like-HOX genes, HOXB4 and HOXB3 (NB4 and NB3), prompting us to examine the HSC expanding potential of NUP98 fusions. Following in vitro culture of BM cells transduced with such fusions, we observed that the HSC expanding ability of HOXB4 can be augmented some 10-fold by fusion to NUP98 gene (i.e. NB4) perhaps due to the strong transactivation properties of the NUP98 fragment. Moreover we documented that NA10 has even more potent HSC expansion activity (>1,000-fold net HSC increase in 10 days) (Ohta et al, ISEH 2004 abstract # 24). To further examine NA10’s HSC expansion potency at a clonal level, multiple replicate cultures were initiated with limiting number of 5-FU treated BM cells estimated to contain ~1-2 CRU (5,000 cells per culture). After 2 days of pre-stimulation, individual wells were retrovirally transduced with NA10 for 2 days using an MSCV-based vector and expanded for a further 6 days. After a total 10-day culture, various fractions of individual wells (ranging from 1/2 to 1/250th of a well) were transplanted in limiting dilution assay for lympho-myeloid competitive repopulating cells (CRU). All recipients from individual GFP control wells (initiated with 25,000 cells) were not reconstituted. In marked contrast, all wells assayed for NA10, were positive for lympho-myeloid reconstituting cells at all dilutions tested. At the highest transplant doses (1/2 of a well), 100% of recipients from 4 wells tested were strongly positive for donor cells, averaging 71.5%, 9.0%, 29.0%, 16.4% for myeloid, B-lymphoid, T-lymphoid, RBC for GFP+ donor derived cells respectively. Most strikingly, transplantation of 1/250th of a well yielded 23.4% reconstitution of 5 positive mice (total of 2 wells assayed) and all recipients at this dilution were positive revealing more than a 250-fold increase of HSCs. In support of this, Southern blot analysis showed similar band patterns among different recipients transplanted with cells from the same wells consistent with clonal expansion from 1-2 starting HSC. We further tested the HSC expanding potential of NA10 using highly enriched c-kit+Sca-1+Lin− starting cells, demonstrating >7,000-fold expansion of short-term repopulating cells at 5 weeks post-transplant, and longer term follow-up is in progress. Taken together these results provide strong evidence of the potent ability of NA10 to induce the ex vivo expansion of HSCs at a clonal level. Although the NA10 induced expansion of HSC has not associated with leukemia with observations over 10 months, further development of protein-based delivery systems for NA10 such as TAT-fusion proteins (Krosl et al, Nat Med, 2003) are in progress as a possible novel stem cell expanding agent for safe therapeutic application.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicMesenchymal stem cell researchFrench-language works237,207