Relevant Surgical Anatomy of Pterygomaxillary Dysjunction in Le Fort III Osteotomy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Le Fort III osteotomy represents the foundation of surgical correction for midface hypoplasia. One serious complication of Le Fort III osteotomy is severing the internal maxillary artery or its branches during osteotome advancement for pterygomaxillary dysjunction. This study sought to characterize the relevant surgical anatomy of the infratemporal fossa and of the internal maxillary artery as it enters the pterygomaxillary fissure. METHODS: Bilateral midface dissections were performed on 15 fresh, normocephalic adult cadavers (30 hemifaces). Four superficial anatomical measurements were performed on the surface of the face, followed by 10 deep measurements of the internal maxillary artery and its branches relative to the infratemporal fossa and its surrounding bony landmarks. RESULTS: The distance from the anterosuperior aspect of the zygomatic arch to the sphenopalatine artery entering the pterygomaxillary fissure was 38.9 ± 3.2 mm. The distance from the alveolar process of the maxillary bone to the sphenopalatine artery entry into the pterygomaxillary fissure was 30.3 ± 6.4 mm. The zygomaticofrontal suture was 43.4 ± 8.5 mm from the sphenopalatine artery entry into the pterygomaxillary fissure, 58.8 ± 8.0 mm from the pterygomaxillary junction, and 74.9 ± 6.5 mm from the maxillary alveolar process. The distance from the sphenopalatine artery to the posterior superior alveolar artery was 14.4 ± 4.1 mm. Elevation of the internal maxillary artery from the lateral pterygoid plate was 5.8 ± 2.5 mm. CONCLUSION: This study characterizes the surgical anatomy of the infratemporal fossa in the context of Le Fort III osteotomies and their associated pterygomaxillary dysjunctions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".