Utilization of sexual health and pelvic floor physiotherapy services in Vancouver’s Prostate Cancer Supportive Care (PCSC) Program.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
163 Background: The Vancouver Prostate Centre established PCSC in January 2013 to provide education and clinical services to men with prostate cancer (pts) and their partners. The program includes a dedicated sexual health (SH) clinician and physiotherapist (PT) with expertise in male pelvic floor anatomy and physiology. Educational and clinical services are available to pts without charge. We examined the use of the SH and PT services in PCSC to better understand how the services are utilized. Methods: Pts who are pre-treatment or within 6 months of surgery or radiation are offered a group educational (ED) session regarding sexual rehabilitation with the option of visits to the SH clinic. Those who were > 6 months from surgery or radiation were offered evaluation in the SH clinic. Pts who are about to undergo surgery or who have postoperative incontinence are offered attendance at a group ED session and/or 3 visits with the PT clinician. We gathered data from PCSC logs, clinic schedules, and patient records to assess utilization of SH and PT services. Results: SH and PT ED sessions and clinics (CLIN) were initiated in July and October 2013 respectively. Of 802 pts oriented to PCSC, 400 pts, median age 64 (42-92), participated in the SH module and 229, median age 66 (range 42-88) in the PT module. 90% of patients in each module had been treated with surgery; 10% were on ADT. Details of utilization of the ED and CLIN components by pts for both modules are shown in the table below. There was a total of 781 SH clinic visits: 141 pts had one visit, the remainder had a median of 3 visits (range 2-8). For PT, there were 334 visits, with a median of 2 (range 1-4) per pt. 37% of pts who were seen by SH were also seen by PT and 65% of those seen in PT were seen in SH. Conclusions: Sexual dysfunction and urinary incontinence can be significant problems, and often occur together. The PCSC Program offers both educational and clinical services to address these issues, and continues to modify its programs to best serve patient and partner needs at various time points after therapy. [Table: see text]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".