MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

First report of <i>Pepino mosaic virus</i> in tomato in Morocco

2017· article· en· W2590042460 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Amal Souiri, Mustapha Zemzami, Hayat Laatiris, Saaïd Amzazi, Moulay Mustapha Ennaji

Bibliographic record

VenueNew Disease Reports · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSolanumBiologyPlant virusHorticultureVirologyVirus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pepino mosaic virus (PepMV) is a member of the Potexvirus genus (Martelli et al., 4) that infects a relatively broad host range of plants in the Solanaceae, particularly tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) and causes significant losses. The virus was first reported in Europe in 2000 (van der Vlugt et al., 6). Subsequently, it has been identified in Canada and the United States (French et al., 3) and has become widespread on greenhouse tomatoes in many countries. In Morocco the occurrence of PepMV is unrecorded as no surveys on its incidence have been performed until now. Notwithstanding this there are several interception reports of PepMV infection in exported Moroccan tomato fruit suggesting the presence of the virus in the production area (European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization, 2). Early in 2009, possible disease symptoms were observed on a number of tomato plants growing in greenhouses in the Souss region of Morocco. Plants exhibited a chlorotic mosaic on leaves, necrotic stems and typical fruit marbling (Fig. 1). Based on these observations viral infection was suspected. Seven tomato samples were tested for the presence of PepMV using a DAS-ELISA kit (Agdia, USA). The presence of the symptoms correlated with positive ELISA results. In 2014 five tomato fruits grown near the towns of El Jadida and Skhirat were sampled from markets in Rabat, three of which displayed symptoms typical of PepMV infection and two had non-typical symptoms. Extracts from all five tomatoes tested positive for PepMV infection following DAS-ELISA using monoclonal antibodies raised against a PepMV isolate (Souiri et al., 5). The presence of PepMV in samples from both surveys was confirmed by RT-PCR amplification. Total RNA was isolated from all diseased fruit and one healthy tomato using TRIzol® (Invitrogen, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions and subjected to RT-PCR using a PepMV-specific primer pair Pep3 (5'-ATGAGGTTGTCTGGTGAA-3') and Pep4 (5'-AATTCCGTGCACAACTAT-3') targeting a conserved part of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase gene (Aguilar et al., 1). The cycling regime included reverse transcription for 30 min at 50°C, denaturation for 2 min at 94°C, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 15 s, annealing at 45°C for 30 s and an extension cycle at 60°C for 45 s with a final extension cycle of 7 min at 68°C. PCR amplicons were fractionated by electrophoresis on 1.5% agarose gels and viewed with a UV transilluminator. Amplicons of the anticipated size (624 bp) were produced from all 12 diseased samples, confirming PepMV infection, whilst no amplicons were produced from virus-free controls. RT-PCR products were sequenced in both directions and the sequences were deposited in GenBank under Accession Nos. KP761701 - KP761712. BLAST analysis of the sequences confirmed the presence of PepMV in the diseased samples which was 99% identical to other tomato PepMV isolates (e.g. EF599605 and JX866666). To our knowledge this is the first report of PepMV incidence in Moroccan tomatoes. Since PepMV has become an endemic disease in many countries and is possibly seed transmitted, efforts should focus on phytosanitary control for both import and export of both tomato fruit and seeds. This work was supported by Domaines Agricoles - UCP (Plant Control Unit) Maâmora, Sale Morocco, University Hassan II of Casablanca and the Ministry of Higher Education of Morocco.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNew Disease ReportsSame topicPlant Virus Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207