MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Second interim analysis (IA2) results from a phase II trial of TAK-385, an oral GnRH antagonist, in prostate cancer patients (pts).

2016· article· en· W2590061441 on OpenAlexaff
Fred Saad, James L. Bailen, Christopher Pieczonka, Daniel R. Saltzstein, Paul Sieber, David B. MacLean, Hongliang Shi, Hélène M. Faessel, Neal D. Shore

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLeuprorelinProstate cancerClinical endpointUrologyGonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonistInternal medicineInterim analysisHormone antagonistProstate-specific antigenTestosterone (patch)ProstatePharmacokineticsAntagonistGastroenterologyCancerRandomized controlled trialGonadotropin-releasing hormoneHormoneLuteinizing hormoneReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

200 Background: Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists achieve rapid decrease in testosterone (T) without transient T surge seen with GnRH agonists and thus may avoid clinical flare symptomatology. TAK-385 is an investigational, oral, non-peptide GnRH antagonist highly selective for the human GnRH receptor (IC 50 0.12 nM). We report IA2 results from a phase 2, randomized, open label, parallel group study of TAK-385 in pts with advanced prostate cancer (NCT02083185). Methods: Pts aged ≥ 18 yrs with histologically confirmed prostate cancer, baseline T > 150 ng/dL and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) > 2 ng/mL, who were candidates for first-line androgen deprivation therapy, were randomized to receive oral TAK-385, 80 or 120 mg, once daily (QD) or leuprorelin (LEU) 22.5 mg subcutaneously every 12 wks, for 48 wks. The primary endpoint was effective castration rate of TAK-385 (T < 50 ng/dL) from wk 5–24. Secondary endpoints included: safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and PSA. Results: At data cut-off, 75 pts had received TAK-385 (39 at 80 mg, 36 at 120 mg QD); 20 pts received LEU. Median age was 73 yrs with TAK-385 and 68.5 yrs with LEU; median treatment duration was 35.1 wks and 37.8 wks. After 3 days/4 wks/24 wks of treatment, median T was 36.9/10.6/8.9 ng/dL with TAK385 vs 648.1/13.0/11.5 ng/dL with LEU. T < 50 ng/dL was sustained over 5–24 wks in 92% vs 95% of pts (TAK-385 vs LEU). After 24 wks, PSA was reduced by 97.3% to a median of 0.1 ng/mL with TAK-385 vs 92.4% to 0.2 ng/mL with LEU. All-grade adverse events occurred in 91% vs 95% of pts (TAK-385 vs LEU); the most common were hot flush (59/60%), fatigue (21/15%), elevated alanine aminotransferase (9/10%), nasopharyngitis (8/5%), and elevated aspartate aminotransferase (5/10%). Initial analysis of pooled phase 1/2 data showed similar PK in the phase 2 pts and in previously studied healthy men, with dose-proportional plasma trough levels over > 6 mos. Conclusions: At IA2, the efficacy of TAK-385 was consistent with the GnRH antagonist mechanism of action and the safety profile was good. TAK-385 rapidly reduced T and sustained castration ( < 50 ng/dL) over 24 wks. Further investigation of TAK-385, as an option to injectable GnRH therapies, is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT02083185.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.262
Threshold uncertainty score0.913

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.180
GPT teacher head0.543
Teacher spread0.363 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicProstate Cancer Treatment and ResearchFrench-language works237,207