MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2590314933 · doi:10.1021/acsomega.6b00458

Exploring the Effect of Poly(propylene carbonate) Polyol in a Biobased Epoxy Interpenetrating Network

2017· article· en· W2590314933 on OpenAlexafffund
Ghodsieh Mashouf Roudsari, Amar K. Mohanty, Manjusri Misra

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Omega · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer composites and self-healing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersOntario Ministry of Research and InnovationOntario Ministry of Research, Innovation and ScienceOntario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural AffairsUniversity of Guelph
KeywordsPolyolMaterials scienceUltimate tensile strengthEpoxyIzod impact strength testPropylene carbonateComposite materialGlass transitionDynamic mechanical analysisToughnessPolyurethanePolymerPolyvinyl alcoholChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Poly(propylene carbonate) (PPC) polyol derived from carbon dioxide has been used to make a tough biobased interpenetrating polymer network (IPN). PPC polyol (10, 20, and 30 phr) was added to an epoxy/poly(furfuryl alcohol) IPN, and the effect of PPC polyol on the tensile modulus, tensile strength, tensile toughness, and notched Izod impact strength was determined. Dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) was used to investigate the effect of PPC polyol on the glass-transition temperature. Loss area (LA) as a characteristic of IPN damping properties was evaluated using DMA. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) were used to obtain more information on the morphology of IPNs on the micro- and nanoscale. It was found that the incorporation of PPC polyol improved the notched Izod impact strength and tensile toughness up to 190 and 220%, respectively. The damping factor peak was broadened with the addition of PPC polyol, and the glass-transition temperature was decreased as the amount of PPC polyol increased. The IPN with 20 phr PPC polyol exhibited better damping properties than neat epoxy and the epoxy/PFA IPN. SEM and AFM images revealed that PPC polyol domains were dispersed in the epoxy phase with an average diameter of around 280 nm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.526

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS OmegaSame topicPolymer composites and self-healingFrench-language works237,207