MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2590367719 · doi:10.1111/pbi.12715

Activation of secondary cell wall biosynthesis by miR319‐targeted <i><scp>TCP</scp>4</i> transcription factor

2017· article· en· W2590367719 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Xudong Sun, Wang Chongde, Nan Xiang, Xiong Li, Shihai Yang, Jiancan Du, Yongping Yang

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Biotechnology Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Molecular Biology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMajor State Basic Research Development Program of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaMcGill UniversityEast Carolina University
KeywordsTranscription factorBiologyTranscription (linguistics)BiosynthesisCellCell biologyComputational biologyGeneCancer researchGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The overexpression of miR319 in plants results in delayed senescence, and high levels of miR319-targeted TCP4 transcription factor cause premature onset of this process. However, the underlying mechanisms of this pathway remain elusive. Here, we found that miR319 overexpression results in a decrease in TCP4 abundance and secondary cell wall formation in the stem. Conversely, constitutive expression of miR319-resistant TCP4 promotes secondary cell wall formation, indicating that miR319-mediated TCP4 controls secondary cell wall formation during development. Further analysis revealed that TCP4 might directly bind the promoter of VND7 to activate its expression, which triggers the expression of a VND7 transcriptional network associated with secondary cell wall biosynthesis and programmed cell death and accelerates vessel formation. In addition, the development process gradually increased TCP4 expression. These results suggest that miR319 and its target TCP4 can act as switches that turn on secondary cell wall synthesis and programmed cell death.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations129
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant Biotechnology JournalSame topicPlant Molecular Biology ResearchFrench-language works237,207