MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The initial report of RTOG 0524: Phase I/II trial of a combination of paclitaxel and trastuzumab with daily irradiation or paclitaxel alone with daily irradiation following transurethral surgery for noncystectomy candidates with muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

2014· article· en· W2590440658 on OpenAlexaff
M. Dror Michaelson, Chen Hu, Huong Pham, Douglas M. Dahl, Chin‐Lee Wu, Richard M. Whittington, Gregory P. Swanson, Jacqueline Vuky, R. Jeffrey Lee, Luís Souhami, Brian K. Chang, Asha George, Howard M. Sandler, William U. Shipley

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCystectomyTrastuzumabInternal medicinePaclitaxelClinical endpointOncologyRadiation therapyPopulationGastroenterologyUrologyChemotherapySurgeryBladder cancerCancerRandomized controlled trialBreast cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

LBA287 Background: Most patients (pts) with muscle-invasive bladder urothelial carcinoma (UC) undergo definitive local treatment with radical cystectomy. Up to 50% of pts with UC overexpress HER2/neu, which may be associated with reduced responsiveness to chemoradiation and reduced survival. Many pts with UC have comorbidities that preclude surgery, creating a traditionally underserved population with worse outcomes. RTOG 0524 evaluated the safety and efficacy of trimodality, organ-preserving therapy in pts not suitable for cystectomy. Methods: Pts with invasive bladder UC (stages T2-T4a, N0-1, M0) underwent cystoscopic tumor resection. Tumors were analyzed by HER2/neu immunohistochemistry (IHC) and assigned to chemotherapy group I (IHC 2+ or 3+; paclitaxel and trastuzumab) or II (IHC negative or 1+; paclitaxel alone). Concurrent weekly paclitaxel (50 mg/m2), weekly trastuzumab (group I only) and daily radiation (64.8 Gy total in 36 fractions) were given for seven consecutive weeks. Results: 21 eligible patients were entered in group I and 47 in group 2, with median ages of 80 and 73, respectively. The primary endpoint was acute protocol-defined toxicity related to treatment. Acute toxicity was observed in 7/21 pts (33%) in group I and 14/47 pts (30%) in group II. Most common grade > 3 adverse events in groups I and II were marrow suppression (43% and 17%), diarrhea (33% and 30%), and hyponatremia (14% and 4%). Three deaths on study were attributed to colonic perforation, pneumonia, and sudden death. Radiation completion rates were 72% and 85% in the two groups, and full-dose chemotherapy completion rates were 52% and 51%. Evaluation by cystoscopy and/or tumor biopsy at 12 weeks noted complete response in 9/13 pts (69%) in group I, in 19/33 pts (58%) in group II, and was not performed in the remaining pts. Conclusions: Trimodality bladder-preserving therapy is an appropriate treatment in noncystectomy candidates with invasive UC. The response rate for HER2/neu-targeted therapy is encouraging but may increase certain adverse events in this challenging population. Clinical trial information: NCT00238420.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.430
Teacher spread0.351 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments→French-language works237,207→