MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Perioperative chemotherapy for upper gastrointestinal cancer: Correlation between response to treatment and outcome.

2012· article· en· W2590458383 on OpenAlexaffabout
Thierry Alcindor, Lorenzo Ferri, Steven Ades, Amin Andalib, Khalid Al-Baimani, Marc Hickeson, Giovanni Artho, Martin Chasen, Victoria Marcus, Michael P. Thirlwell

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreOttawa HospitalMontreal General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDocetaxelInternal medicineChemotherapyPerioperativeCancerGastroenterologyEsophagusSurgeryOncology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

95 Background: Perioperative chemotherapy improves outcomes of surgery for upper GI cancer. Some patients have rapid recurrence. We hypothesized that any type of response to chemotherapy would predict better disease-free survival (DFS). Methods: From May 2007 to Sep 2009, 43 patients with operable adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, stomach or gastroesophageal junction went on a multicenter phase II trial. 3 cycles of docetaxel/cisplatin/5FU were given pre and post surgery. We compared DFS between responders and nonresponders after 3 cycles. Clinical response was defined as improvement of ≥ 2 points on a dysphagia score (0: normal swallowing, to 4: total obstruction), metabolic response as ≥ 35% reduction of maximum SUV by PET scan. Lack of nodal involvement or significant histologic regression (less than 50% viable tumor) was considered pathologic response. Log-rank test was used for univariate analysis, Cox regression model for multivariate analysis. All p values are double sided, median follow-up from surgery is 808 days. Results: Clinical response data for 29/40 patients: 26 responses (90%). Median DFS was 405 days for clinical responders vs. 210 days for nonresponders (p= 0.018). Metabolic response data for 28/40 patients : 22 responses (70%). Median DFS was 276 days in metabolic nonresponders, and has not been reached in responders (p = 0.009). 14 patients had no nodal involvement at resection (N0) and had longer DFS (median not reached) than the 26 with N+, who had median DFS of 562 days (p = 0.045). A nonsignificant trend (p = 0.192) was seen in favor of the 20 with significant tumor regression (DFS 565 days) compared to the 20se without it (median DFS not reached). All results were supported by multivariate analysis. Conclusions: These preliminary results indicate that clinical, metabolic and pathologic responses may be individually predictive of longer DFS in patients receiving perioperative chemotherapy for upper GI adenocarcinoma. This requires confirmation in larger datasets. The optimal management of nonresponders is unclear at present. Acknowledgements: Biostatistics Unit (McGill University Health Centre) and Cedars Cancer Institute (Henry R Shibata Fellowship to Dr Alcindor).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.166
GPT teacher head0.504
Teacher spread0.339 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicGastric Cancer Management and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207