MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Classification of a VUS in <i>MLH1</i> using a combination of family segregation studies and protein biochemistry.

2013· article· en· W2590508760 on OpenAlexaff
Kevin Zbuk, Kathleen Bell, Anna Zhou, Alba Guarné, Melyssa Aronson, Jordan Lerner‐Ellis, Aaron Pollett, Laura Palma, George Chong

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGenetic factors in colorectal cancer
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityJewish General HospitalMcMaster UniversityMount Sinai HospitalJuravinski Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMLH1GeneticsMicrosatellite instabilityDNA mismatch repairPoint mutationMutationLynch syndromeComputational biologyMutagenesisGeneMedicineBiologyMicrosatelliteDNA repairAllele

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

342 Background: The identification of variants of unknown clinical significance (VUS) presents a challenge for diagnostic laboratories and clinicians working with families with Lynch syndrome (LS). Although a variety of strategies exist to attempt clarification, data from multiple sources is often required before a VUS is re-classified to pathogenic or benign. Methods: We report on the investigation of 2 families with a variant in the MMR gene MLH1, c.2038T>C (p.Cys680Arg). In addition to segregation analysis, and review of published literature, the c-terminal domain of MLH1was cloned, the p.Cys680Arg variant was generated using site-directed mutagenesis and protein expression was induced. In addition, this point mutation was modelled onto the crystal structure of the dimerization domain of MLH1. Results: Both families fit Amsterdam criteria for a diagnosis of LS. All available tumours exhibited MLH1 deficiency and microsatellite instability and all living affected individuals available were positive for MLH1 p.Cys680Arg variant. Protein studies confirmed that p.Cys680 resides in a tight hydrophobic cavity and the p.Cys680Arg mutation disrupts the folding of the C-terminal domain of MLH1. In two families this variant segregated with disease in a total of 12 individuals (>10 meiosis and >1000:1 odds in favor of linkage) and 3 had an MLH1 deficient tumour, supporting a pathogenic role for this variant. Inspection of the crystal structure of MLH1 suggested that the Cys680Arg mutation should severely alter the folding of the dimerization domain. As opposed to the dimerization domain of MLH1 that can be readily produced recombinantly and is stable in solution, the same domain of MLH1 encoding the Cys680Arg mutation was expressed as inclusion bodies, confirming that this mutation causes misfolding of the dimerization domain of MLH1. Conclusions: Our data confirms that the p.Cys680Arg mutation destabilizes the dimerization domain of MLH1, and presumably the DNA mismatch repair proficiency of individuals carrying this mutation. Based on this evidence and family history data, the MLH1 C680R missense variant is classified as pathogenic. This approach may prove useful in the classification of other variants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.248
GPT teacher head0.495
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicGenetic factors in colorectal cancer→French-language works237,207→