Le je dans le nous : repenser la valeur documentaire de Dans un gant de fer à l’aube du 21 e siècle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article examine le role pionnier que joue Dans un gant de fer (1965-66) dans les questionnements feministes des annees 1960. A quelques exceptions pres, la critique a initialement limite ses commentaires a la speculation concernant la vraisemblance de l’autobiographie de Claire Martin. Les 40 dernieres annees ont vu le developpement d’outils d’analyse qui permettent de cerner les qualites litteraires des autobiographies et d’interroger ladite condition feminine, ce qui a enrichi l’etude du texte revendicateur qui nous interesse. Bien que Dans un gant de fer ne soit pas souvent reconnu comme un texte esthetiquement feministe, quelques chercheurs ont recemment signale, sur le plan global de ce recit, l’incorporation d’elements formels traditionnellement feminins et masculins. Pour notre part, nous analysons de pres des passages specifiques afin de mieux comprendre la destabilisation que Martin effectue relativement a la caracterisation binaire du masculin et du feminin. Nous lisons Dans un gant de fer notamment a cote de deux documents de reforme officiels qui lui sont contemporains, a savoir les Rapports Bird et Parent. Tous les textes etudies abordent deux enjeux-cles des revendications des annees 1960 : les roles changeants des femmes et la restructuration des ecoles quebecoises. L’examen de leurs similarites formelles nous permettra de demontrer comment l’autobiographie de Claire Martin remet en question la separation conventionnelle de l’objectif et du subjectif ainsi que du public et du prive.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".