MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

A retrospective analysis of clinical factors influencing response to treatment with cabazitaxel in patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer.

2015· article· en· W2590656741 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel Yokom, Nimira Alimohamed, Eric Winquist, Scott Berry, Stacey Hubay, Jean‐Baptiste Lattouf, Helene Leonard, Carla Girolametto, Fred Saad, Srikala S. Sridhar

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalHôpital Notre-DameLondon Health Sciences CentreGrand River HospitalHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science CentreUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCabazitaxelMedicineDocetaxelProstate cancerEnzalutamideOncologyInternal medicineTaxaneProstate-specific antigenCancerUrologyAndrogen deprivation therapyBreast cancerAndrogen receptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

281 Background: The TROPIC trial demonstrated that cabazitaxel improves overall survival (OS) in mCRPC patients progressing on or after docetaxel; a setting where both abiraterone and enzalutamide are also approved. We evaluated baseline factors that may help predict prostate specific antigen (PSA) response or PSA progression defined as per the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 2 (PCWG2) criteria and OS in mCRPC patients treated with cabazitaxel. Methods: Forty patients from five centres participated in an early access program and were retrospectively reviewed to capture baseline characteristics, disease history, prior and subsequent treatments, PSA response, and OS. The influence of selected variables on PSA response and OS were evaluated by univariate and multivariate stepwise regression analysis. Results: At cabazitaxel initiation, median age was 65, ECOG 0-1 (90%), median PSA was 216 ng/mL, 25% had visceral disease and 70% had pain. Median number of prior docetaxel cycles was 9 and median time from treatment was 9.6 months (5-14.2). Median number of cabazitaxel cycles was 7 (1-27). Fourteen patients received abiraterone before cabazitaxel. In patients with prior abiraterone treatment there was no impact on PSA response compared to patients with no prior abiraterone. In the multivariate regression analysis, presence of visceral disease, low albumin (≤40g/L), low hemoglobin (<100 g/L) and longer time between last docetaxel dose and start of cabazitaxel were correlated with PSA response to cabazitaxel (p<0.10). Age < 65, BMI ≥ 30kg/m2 and presence of pain were linked to an increased likelihood of PSA progression. None of the factors selected were significantly associated with OS. Conclusions: In routine clinical practice, this study suggests that mCRPC patients with visceral disease and a longer time elapsed between last docetaxel dose and start of cabazitaxel may experience a greater PSA response with cabazitaxel.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.175
GPT teacher head0.511
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research→French-language works237,207→