MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Association between polymorphisms of the FOXF1 and MHC locus genes and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

2014· article· en· W2590720397 on OpenAlexaffabout
Wei Fan Liu, Christine Lam, Ryan Del Bel, Kevin Chan, Linda Miller, M. Catherine Brown, Zhuo Chen, Dangxiao Cheng, Devalben Patel, Wei Xu, Gail Darling, Geoffrey Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHelicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies
Canadian institutionsToronto General HospitalPrincess Margaret Cancer CentrePublic Health OntarioUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGERDMedicineGastroenterologyInternal medicineOdds ratioEsophagusAlleleRefluxDiseaseGeneticsBiologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

15 Background: GERD predisposes to Barrett’s Esophagus (BE), a precursor lesion to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EA). Recently a large genome-wide association study found two germline markers to be associated with BE, FOXF1 rs9936833 (C Allele) and MHC rs9257809 (A allele). An additional study linked FOXF1 rs9936833 to EA. We assessed whether these same polymorphisms are associated with GERD. Methods: Patients with reflux symptoms referred for esophageal manometry/24-hr pH monitoring at University Health Network (Toronto) were enrolled. DNA extracted from blood was genotyped using a Taqman PCR assay. GERD cases were defined as having DeMeester scores of ≥14.7 or prior evidence of reflux esophagitis on endoscopy. DeMeester < 14.7 defined controls. Logistic regression analysis, adjusted for clinical risk factors, was used to calculate odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) for each polymorphism relative to GERD. Results: Of 182 patients, the median age was 50 years, 62% were female and, 52% met the definition for GERD. Males, higher BMI, alcohol consumption, FOXF1, and MHC polymorphisms were each individually associated with GERD. In the multivariate analysis, after adjusting for gender and BMI, FOXF1 rs9936833 remained significant, with an aOR of 1.82 (95%CI: 1.1-3.0; p=0.02) for an increase in each C allele. MHC rs9257809 also remained significant, with an aOR of 9.36 (2.9-30; p<0.001) comparing AA to AG (there were no patients with GG). When both polymorphisms were placed in the same model, the aORs were 2.10 (1.2-3.5; p=0.006) and 11.0 (3.3-36; p<0.001), per increase in each risk allele, respectively. Conclusions: There are strong, significant associations for increased GERD risk by the C allele in FOXF1 rs9936833 and the A allele in MHC rs9257809 among patients complaining of reflux symptoms. FOXF1 is associated with development of gastrointestinal smooth muscle, possibly contributing to the contractibility of the gastroesophageal junction. The MHC polymorphism is in linkage disequilibrium with HLA alleles involved in T-cell regulation, suggesting the possibility of T-cell involvement in reflux esophagitis. WFL and CL are co-first authors. GL and GED are co-senior authors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicHelicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studiesFrench-language works237,207